As extreme adventures go, would you rather die at the bottom of the ocean, or at the top of a mountain, like Everest?
Everest.
At least I could see until the very end.
The people in the sub are in the darkest dark possible.................
...shot in the back by an irate husband.
> As extreme adventures go, would you rather die at the bottom of the ocean, or at the top of a mountain, like Everest? <
I’d prefer dying of a heart attack just after “entertaining” Jennifer Aniston.
But for some reason that option wasn’t on your list.
Everest. You just pass out from the low pressure at high altitudes and don’t wake up. Since there doesn’t appear to be scrubbers in that can, how do they filter out toxic gases? They can’t be vented out at those pressures. Just pumping in more O2 creates an Apollo 1 scenario and another level of toxicity. So you suffocate or burn to death when the O2 ignites. I think I’d have taken some cheap fentanyl with me to OD on just in case.
Everest.
Everest. Way better scenery.
Somehow, “Because it’s there.”, doesn’t work for 20,000 leagues under the sea.
I’d prefer a trip to space, maybe the Moon or Mars.
Everest, at least there’s a great view before you die.