Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: SunkenCiv
Now we’ve done it! We’re tipping over!...................
2 posted on
06/20/2023 9:28:37 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
To: Red Badger
3 posted on
06/20/2023 9:29:51 AM PDT by
Dave911
To: Red Badger
4 posted on
06/20/2023 9:30:02 AM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Red Badger
That RAT Hank was a genius.
6 posted on
06/20/2023 9:32:35 AM PDT by
dforest
To: Red Badger
“...contributing to a sea-level rise.”
Well, technically, if a snowflake hits the ocean, it contributed to sea-level rise. (Either type of snowflake, by the way.) The question is how much. I’m guessing this is something like .000001 mm.
8 posted on
06/20/2023 9:33:55 AM PDT by
dangus
( )
To: Red Badger
9 posted on
06/20/2023 9:34:21 AM PDT by
VTenigma
(Conspiracy theory is the new "spoiler alert")
To: Red Badger
why does the earth wobble?
umm... climate change?
or perhaps it is a sphere spinning in the vaccuous darkness of space...
or perhaps because Americans are obese... many things it could be...
11 posted on
06/20/2023 9:37:13 AM PDT by
teeman8r
(Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world or something )
To: Red Badger
Utter Junk Science. From the plain language summary, tell me if you see the problem:
Melting of polar ice sheets and mountain glaciers has been understood as a main cause of sea level rise associated with contemporary climate warming. It has been proposed that an important anthropogenic contribution is sea level rise due to groundwater depletion resulting from irrigation. A climate model estimate for the period 1993–2010 gives total groundwater depletion of 2,150 GTon, equivalent to global sea level rise of 6.24 mm. However, direct observational evidence supporting this estimate has been lacking. In this study, we show that the model estimate of water redistribution from aquifers to the oceans would result in a drift of Earth's rotational pole, about 78.48 cm toward 64.16°E.
IOW, they are making it all up from models, no actual empirical data supports any of this.
12 posted on
06/20/2023 9:38:28 AM PDT by
Skwor
To: Red Badger
Another reason to shut down farms. We should be willing to starve to save Mother Erf.
13 posted on
06/20/2023 9:38:32 AM PDT by
MtnClimber
(For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
To: Red Badger
but the water is still here and when you pump it out doesn’t more flow in ,LOL
To: Red Badger
It’s one BS article per day from this publication. Anyhoo, we better be careful and not tip over Guam.
15 posted on
06/20/2023 9:39:31 AM PDT by
ConservativeInPA
(Delay Trump’s trial, delay. Elect Trump President. Trump pardons himself.)
To: Red Badger
I don’t believe this. Fake science to support the big lie.
16 posted on
06/20/2023 9:39:37 AM PDT by
CIB-173RDABN
(I am not an expert in anything, and my opinion is just that, an opinion. I may be wrong.)
To: Red Badger
Houston, I have found the problem:
Based on climate models,
17 posted on
06/20/2023 9:41:43 AM PDT by
TomGuy
To: Red Badger
Global tilting! We’re doomed!
18 posted on
06/20/2023 9:42:07 AM PDT by
bwest
To: Red Badger
They can’t make up their minds. Last year they stated it was from the weight of all the concrete China poured.
19 posted on
06/20/2023 9:42:12 AM PDT by
IC Ken
(If the government can just print Money why do I have to pay taxes?)
To: Red Badger
I question any model that deals in centimeters in relation to the whole overall dimensions of the earth. The precision of measurements of the earth from an observer on it can’t be that accurate.
Also in my miniscule portion of the earth, I have a well and a septic system, so what I extract goes right back where it came from. So my extraction if it’s part of the study should be eliminated. There are probably a lot of similar cases say in agriculture.
20 posted on
06/20/2023 9:44:44 AM PDT by
JeanLM
To: Red Badger
Besides the headline, another tip-off to the lunacy is the part where it says “based on climate models”.
Computer software Climate models have become the largest Fiasco of junk science in history. They have become nothing more than a tool of the climate cult.
Science is officially dead.
21 posted on
06/20/2023 9:44:46 AM PDT by
ChildOfThe60s
( If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there..)
To: Red Badger
I don’t believe this for a second. One calving iceberg the size of Manhattan Island redistributes orders of magnitude more water in one event than aquifer pumping could over centuries. Then there are submarine earthquakes, islands being born, millions of tons of silt pouring out of rivers constantly with or without humans around. Also, I noticed that this ‘study’ was written by Asians, with one white guy in Texas to make sure they spelled ‘global warming’ correctly.
22 posted on
06/20/2023 9:44:46 AM PDT by
SpaceBar
To: Red Badger
Question.....Where does water go?
Answer....right back into the aquifers and bodies of water it came from.
There is no such thing as wasting water. Sure you can exceed the capacity to process it, but it still is in the same closed loop.
Unless the Bidens have been selling it to aliens?
23 posted on
06/20/2023 9:46:12 AM PDT by
blackdog
((Z28.310) My dog Sam eats purple flowers.)
To: Red Badger
It tilted to the left. That explains Pride Month and the transjunk.
24 posted on
06/20/2023 9:46:23 AM PDT by
gitmo
(If your theology doesn’t become your biography, what good is it?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson