Posted on 06/16/2023 6:02:06 AM PDT by MtnClimber
The FBI conducted a halfhearted inquiry, at best. Now we know why.
It remains the greatest unsolved mystery related to the events of January 6: Who placed pipe bombs near the headquarters of both the Democratic National Committee and Republican National Committee the night before?
Shortly before the joint session of Congress convened at 1 p.m. to debate the results of the 2020 Electoral College vote, a woman on her way to do some laundry looked down and spotted a device in an alley adjacent to the RNC building. Karlin Younger ran to notify security guards, who then called police. Law enforcement conducted a search of the area and located another device outside the DNC building.
Panic quickly ensued. “I just had to evacuate my office because of a pipe bomb reported outside,” Representative Elaine Luria (D-Va.) tweeted at 1:46 p.m. “I don’t recognize our country today and the members of Congress who have supported this anarchy do not deserve to represent their fellow Americans.”
“I’m sheltering in place in my office,” Rep. Haley Stevens (D-Mich.) tweeted at the same time. “The building next door has been evacuated. I can’t believe I have to write this.”
The media immediately suggested the explosives had been planted by someone loyal to the president; the New York Times noted in its breaking report that the bombs were found “just a few blocks away from the U.S. Capitol, which Mr. Trump’s supporters stormed on Wednesday afternoon.”
Federal authorities promised a full-throated investigation. During a press conference on January 12, 2021, acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Michael Sherwin and Washington FBI Field Office chief Steven D’Antuono emphasized the seriousness of the pipe bomb threat. “They were real devices. They had explosive ignitors,” Sherwin told reporters. D’Antuono announced a $50,000 reward for information leading to the identity and arrest of the perpetrator. The FBI, D’Antuono warned, was “looking at all angles, every tool, every rock is being unturned” in pursuit of the bomber.
A few months later, D’Antuono made another desperate plea for the public’s help in his investigation and doubled the reward. “We know it can be a difficult decision to report information about family, friends, or coworkers but this is about protecting human life. We need your help to identify the individual responsible for placing these pipe bombs to ensure that they will not harm themselves or anyone else.”
But despite sophisticated surveillance tools including geofence warrants that were at D’Antuono’s disposal—methods the FBI continues to use to this day in its ongoing manhunt for January 6 protesters—the trail went cold. So, too, did the national news media’s interest in the story. The January 6 Select Committee completely ignored the pipe bomb threats, relegating the story to two mentions buried deep in the final report’s appendix.
D’Antuono’s bluster notwithstanding, his office conducted a halfhearted inquiry at best. And now the public knows why. During an interview with the House Judiciary Committee earlier this month, D’Antuono disputed claims the bombs were planted to divert law enforcement presence away from the Capitol just before protesters assembled outside the building, a view commonly shared at the time.
Not only did the FBI fail to identify the individual, D’Antuono admitted the FBI does not even know the “gender” of the bomber. He also backtracked on numerous public statements insisting the devices were viable, indeed, deadly. Pressed by Rep. Tom Massie (R-Ky.) to explain how the bombs were operable considering the use of a one-hour kitchen timer attached to the metal tube, D’Antuono admitted that they couldn’t have detonated during January 6. “I don’t know when they were supposed to go off. Maybe they weren’t supposed to go off.”
In perhaps the most alarming portion of D’Antuono’s testimony, he revealed that the FBI does not have a complete account of cell phone use in the area on January 5, data that would easily result in tracking the perpetrator’s identity. In what Revolver News’ Darren Beattie described as “the dog ate the geofencing data” excuse, D’Antuono claimed data from one provider was “corrupted” and unusable.
“It just—unusual circumstance that we have corrupt data from one of the providers. I’m not sure—I can’t remember right now which one,” D’Antuono testified. “But for that day, which is awful because we don’t have that information to search. So could it have been that provider? Yeah, with our luck, you know, with this investigation it probably was, right. So maybe if we did have that—that data wasn’t corrupted—and it wasn’t purposely corrupted. To my knowledge, it wasn’t corrupted, you know, but that could have been good information that we don’t have, right. So that is painful for us to not to have that. So we looked at everything.”
And as if to ward off warranted skepticism about the idea that cell phone data tied to one of the animating moments of January 6 just happens not to exist, D’Antuono told the committee he did not “want any conspiracy theories” surrounding the conveniently missing records.
But, of course, D’Antuono does not need to fuel any “conspiracy theories” about the pipe bomb incident. Beattie has raised numerous questions about the FBI’s handling of the investigation, such as apparently doctored video of the suspect’s movements. It’s also unclear, according to D’Antuono’s testimony, whether the FBI interviewed the woman who first found the device near the RNC. As I reported last year, Younger worked at the time for an agency called FirstNet, a public-private partnership between AT&T and first responders. The month before the Capitol protest, FirstNet received a $92 million grant from the FBI—which is either a wacky coincidence or another way in which FBI surrogates participated in the events of January 6.
Surely with such a professional connection between his agency and Younger, D’Antuono easily could have invited her to answer a few questions. But somehow, his “no stone left unturned” investigation did not include a sit-down with the one individual responsible for finding the bomb and notifying police. Why not?
House Judiciary Committee chairman James Jordan (R-Ohio) wants answers to that and many other unanswered questions. Jordan is asking FBI Director Christopher Wray to explain why, 890 days after the FBI launched the investigation, his agency is still left empty-handed.
The answer, at this point, seems obvious: They want it to be.
The Feds did it again on January 6th, 2021. Many patriotic Americans who's only "crime" was to enter opened doors for them and step foot in the Capitol are behind bars to this day.
This is what the Feds (and the entire Democrat party) wanted.
As intended. The entire thing was to paint the Democrats as victims and Trump supporters as terrorists.
Of course they're not going to question the person who spotted the RNC package.
It doesn't suit their needs.
Occams razor. Needs to be applied to the ENTIRE story line here.
The FBI is going to ignore this until it goes away because they did it. And they’ll get away with this one also.
Here’s what’s astonishing about this:
Nobody’s demanding more. Not a soul I’ve heard has demanded going around this asshat and directly querying the NSA.
This was DC. We all know damned well that NSA scoops up petabytes of data daily just for DC.
They have the phone call in question. No doubt about it.
It’s awfully convenient to say ‘the dog ate the data’, but worse that those investigating the investigators are satisfied with the response.
Congress can subpoena the cell phone records any time they want to and for any reason they want to.
L
But, but, but . . . INSURRECTION!
“It seems to me that if you go right to these individuals that “found” the fake explosive devices then you might be able to piece together what really happened.”
Yep. The FBI’s disinterest and inaction are understandable, but not Jim Jordan’s/Congressional Republicans. Why hasn’t Jordan/his committee had Congressional investigators interview the finder?
“In perhaps the most alarming portion of D’Antuono’s testimony, he revealed that the FBI does not have a complete account of cell phone use in the area on January 5, data that would easily result in tracking the perpetrator’s identity. In what Revolver News’ Darren Beattie described as “the dog ate the geofencing data” excuse, D’Antuono claimed data from one provider was “corrupted” and unusable.”
BS.
They have Stingray cell phone tracking devices all over the city. They know EVERYONE’S location down to a square meter.
In the video of the bomber who was wearing a hoodie, the bomber’s body language, to me, looked feminine.
There was an article posted here which said the woman who found the bomb worked at the Treasury Department.
The FBI lost track of the J6th pipebomber while he was crossing the Grassy Knoll.
“Why hasn’t Jordan/his committee had Congressional investigators interview the finder?”
Yep….. this seems like a good place to start putting the pieces together.
let us not forget the reason for the rally
https://rumble.com/v181401-january-6th-rally-2021.html
peaceful protests until the capitol police tried to stop them
Interesting!
I seem to remember the media only reporting the bomb at the democrat HQ. I think it was a couple of days before any mention was made of a similar device being found at the GOP HQ.
Of all the speculation on the net about the viability of the pipe ‘bombs’ the most consistent part seems to be the lack of a detonator or at least a detonator that looked like it would work. I have come to believe that whatever these items were made of, the intent was to incite fear rather than to do damage.
Yep, the timers were 1-hour egg timer types and the packages were in place for more than an hour. It is pretty clear that they were just for show.
It was the government. Or one of their agents or NGO’s under their control.
I understand what you’re a saying and agree. But you’re getting deeper into it than my original post.
All I’m saying is, folks need to stop thinking that geofencing, Cellphone data, pin registries are going to solve every crime.
If the person in the CCTV is an actual agent or asset, the chances of unraveling this are slim to none, sadly. It would bring down the entire thing, which I agree should be done. And not just for this.
And then there’s this….. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/capitol-riot-pipe-bomber-phone-data-corrupted-fbi
DOJ/FBI overtly and “and in your face” obstruct and ignore Congress, the very folks that are supposed to have unlimited oversight. Until someone legit comes along it’s status quo, unfortunately.
And then there’s this exchange
https://dailycaller.com/2023/06/13/hawley-fbi-official-abate-unintentionally-spy-americans/
Oh, I agree with you there. Completely, as a matter of fact.
Even more, I believe this has opened an entirely new can of worms, and I had a realization when I read an article sometime last year that the Administation, DOJ, and FBI were contracting with “vendors” and allocating money to buy this geofencing data.
When I read that, I immediately realized...they were doing it to circumvent laws that prevent them from spying on American citizens.
Again, a lot of this all boils down to data. Who owns your data?
In China, it is the CCP.
In the West, it is Big Tech.
We need to cut off the access to that data that Government wants and Big Tech has, and which they think they can legally obtain by buying it.
It was in relation to the attacks on the prolife pregnancy centers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.