‘Where’s the feminist outrage?’ Women’s nude spa forced to adopt ‘inclusive’ policy after trans with a penis complains

BPR ^ | 6/8/23 | Melissa Fine

[DallasBiff]

A Seattle court has ruled in favor of a self-described “non-binary transgender woman” — or, as some might say, a “biological male” — and ordered a family-owned, Korean female-only nude spa to adopt an “inclusive” policy.

In January 2020, Haven Wilvich, a trans activist, attempted to procure a membership at the Olympus Spa, a Korean-style health and welfare center with a strict females-only policy

[DallasBiff]

Onward wokist soldier, and they are pissing everybody else off, on their way.

[teeman8r]

if it’s erect, you must eject...

[PGR88]

Feminism has always been a fraud

[teeman8r]

reject... sorry.

[PGR88]

if it’s erect, you must eject...

Seattle: If it's erect, you must accept

[mykroar]

eject works just fine, except in Seattle apparently

[eyeamok]

You make it a Private Club and require everyone to fill out an application REQUESTING membership, Private Clubs can discriminate all they want.

[struggle]

LOLLLLL

[Tell It Right]

The Dims are making society sound like a low-budget movie plot.

Coming soon to theatres near you: A female nude spa is forced to allow a man to attend. Enjoy a coke and a popcorn while you see things from his eyes.

[NorthMountain]

[Jan_Sobieski]

Where’s Lorena Bobbit when she’s needed?

[Telepathic Intruder]

"with a strict females-only policy"

They should have said "vaginas-only".

[Fido969]

“Outrage” nowadays is totally manufactured. There is nothing “grass roots” about it.

[struggle]

One way to fix this would be to post the judge’s phone number and email address.

[Magnum44]

[struggle]

Never mind

Barbara J. Rothstein
(202) 354-3330

[Boogieman]

Might as well close all the spas now. If you adopt an “inclusive policy” the majority of your customers won’t come back, so you’ll go broke anyway. So take the money and run while you still can and invest in some tranny-proof business instead.

[sphinx]

Lesbians with erections are a protected class. You can find this in the 47th penumbra of the 93rd emanation, but only if you have the last software update to your woke reading goggles.

[Mariner]

WSHRC is not a court.
And it has no authority.

[Phoenix8]

Perhaps there were a few concerns (honestly I can’t think of any besides girls not having equal sporting opportunities in schools) but overall it’s a tool to divide and cause strife. Women have had suffrage since 1920 so how exactly were they being repressed I wonder?

Part of the Cloward-Piven/Marxist/Revolutionary left strategy.