Posted on 05/03/2023 1:31:04 PM PDT by ransomnote
[H/T Red Badger]
Here is a high-level review of the manufacturing contracts between US DOD and Moderna.
Moderna’s injection, mRNA-1273 is co-owned with the US Government, as the company has been funded by the defense research grants for years and also received intellectual property transfers from the US Government, in addition to preclinical and clinical research work conducted for Moderna by the NIH Vaccine Research Center. The NIH and Moderna each have a separate Investigational New Drug number for this product.
Moderna entered 2 types of contracts with the US Government for Spikevax injection:
- “Vaccine” contract and amendments that specifies R&D projects that the US Government ordered and paid for. Note that in Pfizer’s case no R&D activities were ordered or paid for by the US Government, as these were excluded from the scope of the contract.
- “Manufacturing” contract(s) that ordered a large-scale manufacturing. This is different from Pfizer manufacturing contracts as the words “demonstration” and “prototype” are not used. I believe this is because OTA contracts must be for prototypes but FAR contracting doesn’t have to be.
Note on redactions. In both Moderna and Pfizer’s contracts many areas are redacted indicating a reason for redaction – the “redaction codes.” Redacted content has been given codes b (4) and b (6), standing for:
(b) (4) Disclosure of information that would affect the application of advanced technology in a U.S. weapons system,
and
(b) (6) Disclosure of information, including information of foreign governments, that would cause serious harm to relations between the United States and a foreign government or to ongoing diplomatic activities of the United States.
There are several versions of the contract available, plus amendments. The first version was signed on August 9, 2020 and the last available version is June 15, 2021. In one of them the name of the signatory on the Moderna side was redacted with (b)(6). In another version it’s unredacted – it was Hamilton Bennett, a senior director of vaccine access and partnerships.
MORE AT LINK: https://brownstone.org/articles/proof-vaccines-were-military-backed-countermeasure/
"The motive force of Brownstone Institute was the global crisis created by policy responses to the Covid-19 pandemic of 2020. That trauma revealed a fundamental misunderstanding alive in all countries around the world today, a willingness on the part of the public and officials to relinquish freedom and fundamental human rights in the name of managing a public health crisis, which was not managed well in most countries. The consequences were devastating and will live in infamy."
PING
Underfunded Liabilities + National Security Threat = Vaccines
The government “owning” a patent, especially for a medical experiment, is a conflict of interest when it comes to the Emergency Use Authorization and the manufacturer’s indemnification.
The stupid here about vaccines is breathtaking.
what stupid are you referring to?
and what definition of vaccine are you using
Enquiring minds want to know
Yes, I’d like to know also.
So once again the American Public are used to test a new weapon.
Gotta love the goobermint.
Some of the scariest words you can hear
“we’re from the government and hear to help”
“So once again the American Public are used to test a new weapon.”
You wouldn’t want vaxxes tested on lab rats, would you?
That would violate the lab rats animal rights!
For me it's the Brownstone idiots thinking the Trump administration's marketing phrase "whole of nation approach" is some coded term for a military takeover.
That's stupid on stilts.
what definition of vaccine are you using
The Oxford one works for me:
"a substance used to stimulate immunity to a particular infectious disease or pathogen..."
That is a great definition of vaccine—if it totally fails to prevent infection or disease transmission it is still a vaccine.
Big Pharma has gotta love it!
If it's extremely effective in preventing serious disease and death, as the mRNA vaccines were, I don't care what we call it.
“a substance used to stimulate immunity to a particular infectious disease or pathogen...”
that definition does not work for me.
if I gave you some aluminum or mercury and you used it to help stimulate your immunity I could claim it fit your definition.
As I've said, if it's as effective in saving lives as these mRNA shots were I don't care what you call it.
Bkmk
They studied the Swine Flu vaccine results.
They required that all Soldiers receive the Anthrax vaccine.
They saw that they could get away with it.
“You must have the Covid vaccine.”
Of course SemiBrainDead knows they were neither effective nor safe, but keepon atrollin’ ... ymmv
lying with statistics is a skill.
and excluding results you don’t like is par for the course.
but the study did say this
The proportion of vaccinated persons admitted to the ICU was similar to that among unvaccinated persons (505 [19.5%] vs 1961 [21.7%], respectively; P = .13), as were proportions for in-hospital death (216 [10.1%] vs 802 [9.9%], respectively; P = .89). Median length of stay in vaccinated persons was shorter (median, 4.3 days [IQR, 1.9-8.9] vs 4.6 days [IQR 2.3-9.3], respectively) (Table 1). On multivariable analysis, vaccination was not significantly associated with a reduced risk of severe disease (ie, ICU admission or death) (aRR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.65-1.07; P = .16) (eTable 5 in the Supplement). The sensitivity analysis using the propensity score–matched cohort included 2000 vaccinated and 2000 unvaccinated patients (eTable 6 in the Supplement). Results from the analysis of this cohort were similar to the primary model; vaccination was not significantly associated with reduced risk of severe disease (aRR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.59-1.10; P = .16; full model not shown).
which shows there are not statistically meaningful differences.
besides who knows how many of the vaxxed have already died suddenly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.