Is Dr. Ahmad Malik really more believable to you than someone whose an MD and participates on this site?
Let me fix that for you: “Someone who SAYS he/she is an MD and participates on this site?”
1. Some claim they have an MD, but are unverifiable aliases if they do.
2. Dr. Ahmad Malik Is not anonymous.
3. Some FRoctors pushed the vaxx and have not changed their mind.
So yes.
Is someone who participates on FR and who happens to be a doctor more believable than an attorney general?
BREAKING: Texas Attorney General Launches Investigation Into Big Pharma for Covid Vaccine Fraud
https://beckernews.com/breaking-texas-attorney-general-launches-investigation-into-big-pharma-for-covid-vaccine-fraud-50172/
‘Is Dr. Ahmad Malik really more believable to you than someone whose an MD and participates on this site?’
well, if Dr. Malik says something I agree with, he is more credible; if he says something I disagree with, he’s nothing but a quack...
Definitely less gaseous.