Posted on 04/29/2023 4:28:29 AM PDT by Libloather
Headline should read Oregon democrats encourage shooting the homeless.
At least that’s what they seem to want.
I’m sure the Dems people voted for in Seattle, San Franfreako, Los Angeles and other places along the Left Coast will move to codify this into their own existing codes (aka ‘laws’).
I bet those property values in Porkland and other places around the State are just going to increase like never before!
“And how are these economic hardship cases supposed to afford an attorney for what I am assuming would be a civil case?”
National Lawyers Guild, ACLU or some other anarchist organization will represent them free of charge.
Oh! There won’t be any collusion there! LMAO!
It will be a big wildfire season in Oregon if this passes. So many fires started by the homeless.
I heard this bill summed up another way. It turns what people consider public into private. In public, like a sidewalk or park, you have no expectation of privacy. It’s public after all. Privacy is the opposite. Thus, things people do in private such as bathing, using the toilet, having sex and so on are all now legal. Stopping someone who is homeless from doing these things is now illegal. The police cannot stop them.
So how does this work ???
A homeless guy comes into my property and I tell him to leave
That’s harassment ???
What if I say I’ll call the police ???
Have I committed a felony ???
Yeah probably
Seems to me that government has just devolved from being the arbiter of human nature to choosing sides - the side opposing property rights. Government no longer has standing to enforce laws.
“How many of the homeless have attorneys?”
They’ll have as many as they want - funded by you.
Squatting on another’s property for a long time legally conveys ownership. The government wants to prevent people from protecting their ownership. Wouldn’t this be an unconstitutional “taking”?
/\
This is the heart of the matter.
Defacto elimination of private property.
If you can’t control who is on your property
there IS NO private property.
“And how are these economic hardship cases supposed to afford an attorney for what I am assuming would be a civil case?”
There will be plenty of “homeless advocates organizations” that will eagerly provide “free” lawyers... that you end up paying for.
Whatever you reward you get more of, whatever you punish you get less of. This bill will guarantee more “homeless” and less productive tax paying citizens.
Go for it Oregon, you have not hit bottom, yet!
The best term to describe the USA today is FUBAR
It’s a short step from there to declaring home ownership as an affront to the homeless. Then the the homeless will go all Dr. Zhivago on every property. Fun times.
Because they bring almost no skills to the job market, and/or they drink and drug it up to the point where they are completely unreliable if they are employed.
“here’s your $5k bill for your civil penalty and write a check to the homeless person for $1k...”
I’ve always wondered if 50 IQ noodle-arm leftists who can’t find the bathroom would know how to defend against shoot, shovel and shutup.
Amen to that, brother.
“Should go both ways, no?”
Even if it did, suing someone who is already destitute isn’t going to accomplish anything.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.