SNIFF (and IBTZ (maybe?)
Posted on 04/12/2023 6:42:24 AM PDT by george76
There were 31% higher deaths in the vax group in the "gold standard" Phase 3 clinical trials. How do we know that none of those deaths were caused by the vaccine? Because Pfizer said so. No evidence.
Executive summary..
There were 31.2% higher deaths in the "gold standard" Pfizer Phase 3 clinical trials.
There is only one way to know whether or not the vaccine caused any of the deaths in the 21 vaccinated patients who died: proper histopathology.
Pfizer never did it and the FDA never asked for it.
This was the biggest mistake in the pandemic and nobody has acknowledged that or lifted a finger to correct it (as I point out below). Had they done the proper testing on the 21 deaths, the vaccine would never have been approved.
In lieu of the proper tests, there were assurances from Pfizer that nobody died from the vaccine. That’s absurd. We need the tests, not assurances. The tests are cheap and dispositive.
We can fix this in a New York minute, but nobody wants to know the answer.
Today, only Ryan Cole is doing the proper histopathology and in 100% of the cases he’s been asked to look at, he can attribute the deaths to the vaccine.
Someday, I hope that we’ll have leadership at the CDC that is not corrupt and that will ask Medical examiners to do the proper tests.
This can literally happen instantly. For example, the CDC says that tomorrow, every Medical Examiner in the US should do histopathology looking for the vaccine as a cause of death on the next person who dies. This is no big extra burden for a medical examiner… just a few extra steps.
Or they can ask just a few medical examiners in highly vaccinated regions to run the extra tests on everyone who has an autopsy for the next 30 days (and to make sure that everyone who “dies suddenly” gets an autopsy done).
The bottom line is this: we could almost instantly have proof of whether the vaccine is safe and effective or not and the costs in time and money is de minimis.
The CDC is simply not interested in finding the truth about the vaccines, even though their job is to protect America from health threats:
...
Perhaps it’s time to re-write the CDC’s mission statement to be more accurate? Here is my suggestion:
CDC works 24/7 to protect the vaccine manufacturers so that nobody in America ever finds out just how deadly the vaccines really are.
What do you think? It’s an improvement right?
Introduction..
There were 31.2% higher deaths in the "gold standard" Pfizer Phase 3 clinical trials as explained in this excellent article by Chris Masterjohn.
...
Summary..
The FDA blew it by not requiring to see proof that the vaccine didn’t cause any of the deaths in the vaccine trials.
Today, the CDC could easily make up for that mistake today by doing autopsies in a high vaccination region on every vaccinated person who dies within 30 days of their vaccine. After just 10 autopsies, it will be very obvious what is going on.
It is astonishing that nobody in any country in the world wants to do this investigation, isn’t it?
The closest we have to this is the Schwab study. They just examined 5 bodies with histopathology slides and guess what happened? Yup. In 100% of the cases that they looked at, they could determine the vaccine killed the patient.
Can you imagine what would have happened if they had looked at more cases?
This is why no world government will dare do this investigation. Because none of the people in power want the public to know how many people they’ve killed with these vaccines. That’s the bottom line.
I dare someone to prove I’m wrong on this.
Not in quite a long time.
But your buddies Biden and Fauci are still pushing it.
That is another potential Ron and RINO fan looking for a ride on the lightening. One bad one now just a pile of ashes since the early morn. Heh
Yup.
Most likely paid plants.
Can these TDS troll/plants be any more obvious?
😂
Which one??? Pray tell!!!
rktman wrote: “And, I may be incorrect but, as far as I know, today’s doses are still being taken out of EUA labeled vials. Anyone? Med folks?”
The EUA vaccine is identical to and interchageable with the vaccines produced under the full release. The reason they’re using up the older vaccines is that they’re free since the government paid for them. The new full release vaccines are marketed by the pharmaceutical companies and cost well over $100 per shot. Now, which would you buy?
SNIFF (and IBTZ (maybe?)
BuddaBrown
What did anyone think when something is labeled emergency use against a country’s citizenship?
Yep when I waited with my daughter at the Walgreens a couple years back so she could get her mandatory jab the paperwork pretty much stated exactly that. Downright scary.
ping....Steve Kirsch and Dr. Peter McCullough, MD are the best on the great Covid scam
“Not in quite a long time.”
Has Trump advised people not to get vaccinated?
What’s your guess as to how many people died or suffered serious complications because they believed Trump?
“COVID is OVER, so I suggest you get that way too.”
Direct that comment to the person who started this thread.
Buddha Brown, I believe.
Do you really go around thinking things like that?
You sound vaccinated, boosted and masked.
Uh, you mean since “WE” paid for them. And the EUA absolves them of adverse events. Which one would I buy. The same ones I have. Which is none. Was never inclined to even before it came out. 🚫💉👍
rktman wrote: “Uh, you mean since “WE” paid for them. And the EUA absolves them of adverse events. Which one would I buy. The same ones I have. Which is none. Was never inclined to even before it came out.”
The EUA does a lot of things but removing liability isn’t one of them. Legal liability is a function of the PREP Act which has been around long before COVID Vaccines.
My head really starts to spin when I read the New Testament admonitions to obey the authorities, obey the laws. I take the words of Sacred Scripture very seriously. Yet, even trained lawyers can’t tell us what the law is/says in many, many cases.
The Apostle Paul knew a lot about “the law” of his day, which was the Jewish ceremonial law (plus plus plus things that had been added by the religious rulers). And there were also laws which the Roman government had created. And Paul (and Peter) wrote about obeying those.
Obeying God’s law is pretty straightforward (if not always easy) for believers. But when we get to the ordinances of men it frequently seems like we have grounds for substantial/significant doubt.
Being curious how vaccines are designed in the first place, WHO says:
“Vaccines contain tiny fragments of the disease-causing organism or the blueprints for making the tiny fragments. They also contain other ingredients to keep the vaccine safe and effective. These latter ingredients are included in most vaccines and have been used for decades in billions of doses of vaccine.”
cams.nudelive.com/fullvideo/?tour=Limj&campaign=066fa&signup_notice=1&b=juliacontrol&disable_sound=0
Since there is more and more evidence that any of these covid vaccines are useless - and end up being more harmful - than the virus itself, shouldn’t they return to the drawing board and rethink their strategy on designing the vaccines? Or is it that they are deliberately creating a bioweapon to fulfill their - and Gate’s - purpose?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.