Posted on 04/03/2023 3:03:28 AM PDT by nikos1121
I beg of you, writers, enough with the gritty remakes.
The single star which I have awarded FX’s adaptation of Charles Dickens’ “Great Expectations” belongs to the following people: Olivia Colman, reliably excellent as Miss Havisham; Matthew Needham, having an absolute ball playing a demented spice baron; Matt Berry, given too little screen time as a local fixer; Owen McDonnell, whom I’d watch in just about anything, as a kindly blacksmith; and Ashley Thomas as the supremely confident, gnarly solicitor. Those five actors are carrying a production so badly written and so tritely directed (and photographed and scored) that viewers will struggle to stay awake.
Pip Gargery (Fionn Whitehead) is an orphan living in coastal Kent with his blacksmith brother-in-law Joe (McDonnell) and his viciously abusive sister Sara (Hayley Squires). Like most of Dickens’ orphans, Pip dreams of a grand life in which he does not have to adopt Joe’s trade; he wishes to travel the world. The local wealthy madwoman, Amelia Havisham (Colman), twisted by rage at being abandoned by the altar, lives in her wedding dress while destroying her adopted daughter Estella’s (Shalom Brune-Franklin) emotional and psychological health. Pip is hired to serve as a companion to Estella; Miss Havisham observes the pair and encourages Estella to treat him with abject cruelty. An unknown benefactor finances Pip’s journey into London life, where he meets his new boss, Mr. Jaggers (Thomas). Together they try to topple the spice trade empire of Bentley Drummle (Needham), a craven man engaged to Estella.
Though most of the cast provide interesting performances, each of their takes on their characters belong to different genres. Colman’s take on Havisham is riveting, imbuing each word not with moping and sorrow but with poisonous rage and a hellbent desire for revenge on any man she can find. Berry’s Pumblechuck doesn’t get much to do, but the light and dark shades of the character could have added more layers to the scenes in Pip’s village (which is his exact purpose in the book); the same is true for McDonald, while Thomas’ Jaggers belongs in a steampunk film. But Steven Knight, the series writer and creator, bothers with neither cohesion nor coherence. Instead, the writing feels more like a combination of Robert Downey Jr.’s “Sherlock Holmes,” “Peaky Blinders,” (which Knight created) along with a dash of “Game of Thrones”-style operatic world-building. You know who knew how to effectively document the darkness and despair of 1860s London? Charles Dickens. And he didn’t need a dominatrix, orgies, or a literal shoot-out at a burning mansion to do it.
The craft of the series is sorely lacking. Of course, 1860s London was gray and black and miserable, but why does everything in that tonal palette now have to look like “Ozark”? The original score for the series is senseless too. It is possible to effectively use modern music in a period piece (“Marie Antoinette” and “Corsage” come to mind), but the only way I can describe what I heard here was “True Detective” lite. Turns out, that’s not a coincidence: composer Keefus Ciancia assisted T-Bone Burnett on the background score of the HBO blockbuster. But where “True Detective” was tempered with generous dollops of metal, hip-hop, country, and psychedelic rock, Ciancia’s score for “Great Expectations” sounds like minimalist dubstep meets Nine Inch Nails. It simply does not work, and the more annoyed I became with the poor quality of the writing—practically every line of dialogue is either an insult or a threat, all possessing the sharpness of a rusted kitchen blade—the more aggravating the score seemed too. Additionally, I’m a proud advocate for color-blind casting, but such a practice is only interesting when done well. You can’t hire a diverse cast, hand them rubbish lines of dialogue that stretch even the most generous of audience imaginations, and expect praise for your efforts.
However, it all comes back to the writing, something that Knight has been lauded for in the past (“Eastern Promises”) but equally criticized, especially lately (“A Christmas Carol”). In “Great Expectations,” Knight’s writing constantly hits the audience over the head, as if to cement the idea that adding sex and violence makes something edgier and cooler, and therefore better than what came before. Charles Dickens wasn’t exactly known for writing lighthearted stories, and Great Expectations is far from his best work, but there's enough on the page that doesn't need to be enhanced to get attention. (His best work, in my humble opinion, is Bleak House or The Old Curiosity Shop.) Why do sex and violence have to be added to an adaptation in order to make it appealing? Why is it so difficult to honor the source material without resorting to cheap tricks? Joke’s on me, I suppose. I saw Colman’s name in the trailer a month ago and rushed to my editor to pitch this review. Next time, I’ll consider the writer too and temper my … expectations.
I've waited in anticipation of the 2023 Great Expectations (Remake), but halfway thru the 3rd episode, I couldn't take it anymore and pray to God to give these few hours back to me before I die.
Episode 1 was intriguing, esp Olivia Coleman's portrayal of Miss Haversham, but well into it, I got the uncomfortable feeling that I was being sucked into the latest attempt of adding "wokeness" into a classic story by one of the Greatest Writers of all time. What's next, Cinderella as a pygmy from New Guinea who meets a "gay" Frederick the Great?
We all know the story. Young Pip is raised by his domineering and hateful sister and Joe her husband. One day, as he returns from his parent's marsh grave he runs into an escaped convict, Megwig, whom he befriends, then he's introduced to Miss Haversham and her adopted daughter, Estella, and he's off to the races to become a gentleman.
I'm ok with Estella as a black girl, in fact, I thought that it made sense as she's adopted from the seamy side of life, but she's not appealing in the least bit, and trying get us to believe that young Pip is in love with her is a stretch.
Then having Jaggers as an aggressive black kick-ass attorney in brutally racist London at the height of the British Empire, slave trade and all, is laughable. His character would last five minutes before he'd been tarred, feathered, lynched and his carcass fed to dogs.
F-bombs, (yeah, from young Pip's mouth even), flow like water, alone making it inappropriate for family viewing, but to make it doubly sure no one is going watch much of this garbage they throw in sadomasochism, sodomy and toe-cringing violence for good measure.
The only saving grace about this PODS. (D=Dog), is to remind us that "wokeness" ruins everything.
Charlie Dickens must be rolling in this grave.
I’ve seen countless times every single Dickens movie and was excited to see this one. Well, I couldn’t finish even the first episode. I don’t know why I was expecting anything different.
Thank you. Nandini Balial and you have saved me from maybe destroying my TV and my sanity.
The 2023 Great Expectations sounds exactly as I figured it would. Modern & revisionist. 2023 ‘sensibilities’ into 1860 London. Girlie men, manly women and many POC, into a time and a place where there were few.
p
About a third thru the 3rd episode I had enough. I went to Prime and rented the 1946 version with John Mills as Pip and Jean Simmons as Estella. You also have a young Alec Guiness. WHAT A JOY TO WATCH!!!!
Wokeness ruins everything. The Disney remakes and new movies suck wet dog fur, IMO.
Can you imagine them redoing Pride and Prejudice into a woke-piece?
Don’t thank him, thank me.....
“Matt Berry, given too little screen time as a local fixer...”
I’ll watch Matt Berry chew the scenery in anything. He’s a pretty good musician too.
Coleman’s Haversham is interesting, but the rest is rubbish.
Thanks for the heads up. I was on the fence about investing time in this, but hearing about race swapping Estella tells me enough.
I’m not kidding, I wouldn’t waste ten seconds.
It looks like the viewership is way down already. Rotten Tomatoes has it at 36% like.
I think the only critics giving it a positive review OBVIOUSLY WROTE THEIR CRITIQUE WITHOUT actually watching it, and primarily applauding the ‘wokeness.”
Did I say that wokeness ruins everything?
The old black-and-white version was quite good and followed the novel pretty closely.
I liked the modern version which was a feature movie starring Anne Bancroft as Miss Dinsmore (Miss Havisham). She was great.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.