To: adorno
They were talking about putting nato weapons right on the border with Russia.
13 posted on
03/18/2023 7:53:53 AM PDT by
ganeemead
(Ukraine/Zelensky: Adding an element of chutzpah to ordinary Nazism...)
To: ganeemead
They were talking about putting nato weapons right on the border with Russia.
NATO weapons didn't need to be on the border with Russia, since, NATO weapons can be effective from hundreds, if not thousands of miles away. If NATO weapons are Putin's escuse for invading Ukraine, then, it's a phony excuse, and he was looking to invade anyway.
However, the result of the invasion is that NATO weapons are now close to Russia, since those weapons being used by Ukraine are from NATO and the U.S. Invasion backfired! Big Time!
17 posted on
03/18/2023 8:07:09 AM PDT by
adorno
To: ganeemead
NATO weapons have been right on the border with russia for decades. Now, thanks to putin’s aggression on Ukraine, NATO is about to add Finland (in other words, hundreds more miles of russian border with NATO weapons wight on it). Is invading Finland next?
A more accurate analogy for putin’s invasion would be ‘her skirt was so short, I had no choice but to rape her!’
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson