Posted on 03/08/2023 11:25:34 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
A black couple has settled a lawsuit with a property appraiser who undervalued their California home by almost half a million dollars.
Paul Austin and Tenisha Tate-Austin’s four-bedroom residence in swanky Sausalito, near San Francisco, was valued at $998,000 by Janette Miller, co-owner of Miller and Perotti Real Estate Appraisers. That figure was $455,000 lower than an appraisal done for a prior mortgage refinance in 2019.
Feeling that their home was worth much more money, the Austins asked one of their white pals to pose as the owner of their residence. They had the home reappraised — and it was suddenly worth $1.48 million.
The Austins decided to sue Miller and her company claiming that her appraisal was “the direct product of racial discrimination.”
The case has now been settled out of court, with Miller agreeing to pay an undisclosed sum of money to the couple. The settlement also includes an unusual twist: The appraiser was also required to watch “Our America: Lowballed,” a documentary about their “white-washed” saga.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Does such a neighborhood exist?
“I’d rather live next to a black conservative than a white liberal.”
Amen, brother!
Yet another "something bad happened to me, so it must be because I'm black."
An alternate view would be that the appraiser was incompetent.
One appraiser in 2019 correctly valued the home, and the second 2023 appraiser for the "white" friend correctly valued the home.
I think it's more likely that Janette Miller is not very good at her job, or made an honest mistake when performing comparisons of similar home sales for the appraisal.
But racism sells, I suppose.
Rwanda.
I’d rather my nearest neighbor be in the next zip code. But yours is my second choice.
Doubtful, but I have a Scott Adams attitude toward liberal white women. They are the worst. A vile cancer on our nation.
This whole premise is insane. Appraiser "A" gives an appraisal of X. Appraiser "B" comes by at a later date and gives an appraisal of X + 50%. How does this prove any malfeasance or "racism"?
You can look up analyst recommendations for various publicly traded companies and see multiple price targets or valuations for those companies. Are these differences of opinion of the value of those assets based on some sort of "racism"?
I'm happy with a 250-350 foot buffer or so.
I’m not.
Then, I knew some appraisers who would go to the property, do a walk around, etc.
Maybe this had nothing to do with race.
Although the 'racism' claim is still ridiculous and tough to prove, there clearly was incompetence on the part of the appraisal company for not realizing that they had appraised the same house twice within weeks, so they opened the door for a frivolous lawsuit for not at least examining why they appraised the house differently just weeks apart.
I imagine the out-of-court settlement was less than fighting it and hiring attorneys, etc.
Short answer: CA real estate. Capable of unbelievable pricing.
A Sausalito address could be worth $600K just for the empty lot. But you cannot simply place (say) a $500K house on such a lot. That it is built and permitted (I assume) is likely about a $150K proposition before a single nail is driven. A sewer connection, even on a house burned to the ground (or never having been built in the first place) could be a $75K affair.
I partially handled a bungalow house in Fremont, which is a fairly boring town near the bottom of the SF Bay. Maybe 1400 sq feet, in a barely working class neighborhood, 2 bedroom, hardly upgraded since the 60’s, cottage cheese ceilings, fake brick and all. Landscaping thrashed and neglected. But it is a reasonable commute across the Dumbarton bridge to Silicon Valley and it went for $850K 48 hours from being placed on the market.
https://www.tide-forecast.com/locations/Dumbarton-Bridge-San-Francisco-Bay-California
Is there such a thing?
In Sausalito it is. Depending on the view it could go a lot higher.
What this tells me is that liberals are willing to pay $500,000 dollars more in order to not live near black people.
That’s some pretty sound logic.
Several years after purchasing the home, the Austins decided to have it appraised, with an expert saying it was worth around $890,000.
The couple subsequently decided to renovate the home, which was built in the 1960s, pouring more than $400,000 into an overhaul, adding an entirely new level, as well as a new deck, a fireplace and flashy new appliances.
When Jeanette Miller came to value the home in 2020 they were confident the home would be worth well over $1 million and were stunned by her $998,000 figure. . . .
The home was reappraised at $1.48 million — roughly $500,000 more than it was valued at just weeks prior.
Well, you don't normally get more than 1:1 return on your home improvements. But I guess if you claim racism, the ROI is better.
Who cares what it is “appraised” for unless you are borrowing against it. It’s “worth” what somebody will pay you for it.
Non-existent racism again and again.
As much as I am wanting to go with "incompetent appraiser" the punishment is just, despite arriving at it through the wrong route. So the world is in balance.
When we were applying for a loan for our current house, we met the appraiser. Our races were reversed from this story, and he gave us a lower value than we expected, though, not by a large amount, just $30K or so. Never figured it out, but we had no choice. It’s who the lending agency sent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.