Posted on 03/05/2023 12:06:58 PM PST by fightin kentuckian
I find this extremely intriguing and if true, which it likely is, then this is unethical at least and certainly illegal.
Kari said this person called her and told her that he would come to her house in Arizona because it had to be discussed in person.
Kari claimed she was offered a position, title and money by a man from out east, to stay out of politics for the next two years.
This would keep her out of contention, for the Arizona Senate seat and as VP Candidate for whom ever wins the nomination.
The reason for this thread is to discuss who it could have been.
Kari's only clues were that it was a man and that he was from out east and that he visited her in Arizona just before CPAC.
Which political and/or influential donor visited Arizona just before CPAC?
Influential Man from the east....Mitch McConnell, Trump, DeSantis, etc.... Could be lots of people.
What say you?
*claims
She is gonna find herself Arkancided if she’s not careful
Names. It’s the only way to stop these people.
Katie Hobbs?
Such a “job offer” doesn’t have to be made in person.
You may have gotten over your head with this post.
Kari Lake, like Trump, scares the hell out of the establishment. Unlike Sarah Palin, who was naive about the surreptitious motives of leftist Katy Couric, when Kari is confronted by media questions that begin with “Some say that ...,” Kari would ask, “Who says? Name them!”
Mr. Kalamata
That’s exactly right. I believe that Kari won Arizona convincingly because she was a reporter, she was the media, and she could spot a set up and always turned it on the them. They tried every trick in the book to make her look bad and she turned it on them every time.
But that’s not the point. The question is WHO, what person and what group is bribing her and with what position. That is election interference and political corruption, and we need to know who it is.
I don’t know why Kari won’t reveal who it was.
>>I don’t know why Kari won’t reveal who it was.
It is hearsay, unless she recorded it. I suspect that without evidence she could be sued. Conservatives do not fare well with modern juries “of their peers.”
Mr. Kalamata
I believe kari 100%. It happened. If who ever it is decided to sue for libel or whatever it would cause Kari’s defense team to go ahead with discovery. At that point the rest of the conspirators would be outed. And for that reason I don’t believe they’d go after her if she named names.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.