That’s exactly right. I believe that Kari won Arizona convincingly because she was a reporter, she was the media, and she could spot a set up and always turned it on the them. They tried every trick in the book to make her look bad and she turned it on them every time.
But that’s not the point. The question is WHO, what person and what group is bribing her and with what position. That is election interference and political corruption, and we need to know who it is.
I don’t know why Kari won’t reveal who it was.
>>I don’t know why Kari won’t reveal who it was.
It is hearsay, unless she recorded it. I suspect that without evidence she could be sued. Conservatives do not fare well with modern juries “of their peers.”
Mr. Kalamata