Posted on 03/02/2023 9:28:10 AM PST by impimp
https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/88R/billtext/html/HB02889I.htm
No property taxes once you hit 10 kids. Reduction for 4.
Texas is the best and will always be the best because elite minds, like the one who crafted this legislation, will always choose to live here.
No property taxes once you hit 10 kids. Reduction for 4.
Texas is the best and will always be the best because elite minds, like the one who crafted this legislation, will always choose to live here.
Wow!! Texas Property Taxes are high!
yes they are…but no income taxes…I am 100% in favor of this method of reducing the taxes.
We would have qualified. God Bless Texas and Texas mothers!
I would actually trade an income tax for ZERO property tax
For those who are working, especially when both do in a marriage and/or have good incomes, I think the income tax savings is greater than the property tax costs. This is particularly true when compared to most any leftist state (CA, NY, IL, NY, MA, ...).\
For retirees, this appears to be reverse. Most don't make enough non-SS income to generate the large state income tax bills that they do when working. This is where the property taxes in Texas are a bit painful. There are some adjustments made for homeowners 65+, like locking in property tax rates once they hit 65, but many are still complaining about rising property tax bills.
The 15 passenger van will make a comeback. I hope it will be electric. You know, saving the planet and all.
In short, workers in high income tax states generally have a bigger issue with state income taxes than their counterparts do with property taxes in states like TX. On the other hand, retirees tend to have less of an issue with state income taxes, especially if SS makes up a good portion of their income, than their counterparts do with property taxes in states like TX.
If the state wants to reduce taxes then take off a couple percent across the board rather than picking and choosing who gets a 100% reduction.
Women aren’t clown cars.
Me too!
it actually is…10% for one, 20% for two…100% for 10…I see that perhaps I mischaracterized it
Your post makes no sense….who said women were clown cars?
Supreme Court threat from Oberkfell since this bill excludes same sex couples.
All taxation leads to some type of social engineering. It sends a message as to what is good and what is bad…making babies is good.
I hope that is wrong…why can’t the feds respect states rights.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.