Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Fury
Yes, I agree that definitive statements that are made based upon limited information is not to be taken seriously.

Asking the question, was this person vaccinated, is a legitimate question. There is enough evidence being presented by experts in many fields that point to these "vaccines" being deadly.

The overriding clincher to this argument is the time that these Pharma companies demanded that their documents be delayed for 75 years before being released. Do you agree? Do you agree that they are hiding something? Irrelevant question as a judge demanded their release and they have already revealed what they knew their "vaccines" were deadly. 😠

83 posted on 02/06/2023 8:55:54 AM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: Robert DeLong
Do you agree? Do you agree that they are hiding something? Irrelevant question as a judge demanded their release and they have already revealed what they knew their "vaccines" were deadly.

No - the 75 year safe harbor was/is wrong.

Yes - if for nothing more than related to IP, but I believe that there are safety/efficacy concerns for a subset of the population.

85 posted on 02/06/2023 8:57:51 AM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson