Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Robert DeLong
Do you agree? Do you agree that they are hiding something? Irrelevant question as a judge demanded their release and they have already revealed what they knew their "vaccines" were deadly.

No - the 75 year safe harbor was/is wrong.

Yes - if for nothing more than related to IP, but I believe that there are safety/efficacy concerns for a subset of the population.

85 posted on 02/06/2023 8:57:51 AM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: Fury
Do you agree that they are hiding something? Irrelevant question as a judge demanded their release and they have already revealed what they knew their "vaccines" were deadly.

Yes - if for nothing more than related to IP, but I believe that there are safety/efficacy concerns for a subset of the population.

Let me start off for those who may wonder, IP here is not internet protocol, it refers to intellectual property.

First off, IP are what patents are for. They were claiming trade secrets, which they can guard indefinitely. I personally disagree that a pharmaceutical company should be allowed to claim trade secrets. But even their trade secret could have been removed, withheld, or redacted from the documents being requested. It wasn't until they were requested that they asked for 75 years.

When you state that the safety/efficacy concerns were only for a subset of the population, one could agree with you if that subset were a small number.

However, that is far from the case. In fact, the numbers were so extensive that they had to change the long held definition of what a vaccine is, because these vaccines did not fit the existing definition.

The VAERS (vaccine adverse effects reporting system) contained over 30,000 deaths, and well over a million adverse effects, many of which the people experiencing them will be for their entire lifetime. Since the VAERS data is woefully & grossly underreported, due to varying reasons, these numbers represent only a portion of the true numbers. Some claim it to be 1%, while others claim 10%. This was even reported on by a study done by Harvard.

That means the numbers could be staggering, but in a climate of suppression of the truth that we have all witnessed, these numbers in VASERS itself present a very troubling story, even if we never get the true numbers.

But the real kicker, and one you totally ignored, was my statement that those who are looking at the documents are reporting that the trials themselves before being accepted foe EUA meant that they knew these vaccines were very dangerous and caused significant damage to people, including death.

Time to stop shilling for evil, an admit that they are evil. They only care about money. They are not in the business for anu humanitarian reasons at all. While some of the researchers may be in that business to do good & righteous work, they have no say whatsoever in the companies decisions. Those are the people who eventually decide to come out as whistleblowers.

93 posted on 02/06/2023 10:42:27 AM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson