Posted on 02/06/2023 7:09:00 AM PST by David Chase
They decry hilariously when we apply the “dies with covid” standard to the clot shots...
Studies have been done on many of these Antihistamine & Immunotherapy medications-—they do make you tire, loopy and so forth. We know this-—but what I’m stating, is a forced vaccine that does absolutely nothing. How is that rational and in the scope of a “limited” government. Also, there are articles regarding myocarditis in 11% of pilots after vaccination.
Asking the question, was this person vaccinated, is a legitimate question. There is enough evidence being presented by experts in many fields that point to these "vaccines" being deadly.
The overriding clincher to this argument is the time that these Pharma companies demanded that their documents be delayed for 75 years before being released. Do you agree? Do you agree that they are hiding something? Irrelevant question as a judge demanded their release and they have already revealed what they knew their "vaccines" were deadly. š
Meanwhile...
No - the 75 year safe harbor was/is wrong.
Yes - if for nothing more than related to IP, but I believe that there are safety/efficacy concerns for a subset of the population.
Whatever the individual’s choice is with regards to taking the jab or not, the scientists are paid to care. They are not doing their job. “Slowly killing them”? Sudden deaths are like...sudden.
I agree - forced was/is wrong. I have a couple of nurse friends that I met while in NY. They have decamped for brighter and more lucrative jobs out of state. They have relatives back in NY and go to visit, but I doubt they'll ever return to NY to work full-time.
And rabies? I guess it's not "forced", other than once someone becomes symptomatic they are going to die 99.9% of the time.
iPads can still be used while plugged in and charging. FYI. And there are chargers made for both home and auto, some units can even do both. I even have a solar charger that works well. Hope that gets you up to speed on how the devices work. You might want to consider getting access to an actual computer at some point too. I guess we shouldnāt assume doctors have those now though. Thanks.
Re: 86 - Uh, not saying there are not more serious side-effects.
What I am saying is that as far as I know people that make comments about a death being due to the vax and yes, -joking- about it never issue a retraction or update. No apologies, no nothing. The deaths are for some just so much meat for the narrative.
All sudden deaths are not from the jabs.
A YUGE increase in sudden deaths ARE from the jabs.
The jabs are a factor in many sudden deaths blamed solely on natural causes.
Not to mention that the jabs are DEADLY, DANGEROUS, and USELESS! (they don’t work)
Flury of pro=vaxx posts and news articles appear after Project Veritas/Phizer video. That’s a news item in itself.
Yes - if for nothing more than related to IP, but I believe that there are safety/efficacy concerns for a subset of the population.
Let me start off for those who may wonder, IP here is not internet protocol, it refers to intellectual property.
First off, IP are what patents are for. They were claiming trade secrets, which they can guard indefinitely. I personally disagree that a pharmaceutical company should be allowed to claim trade secrets. But even their trade secret could have been removed, withheld, or redacted from the documents being requested. It wasn't until they were requested that they asked for 75 years.
When you state that the safety/efficacy concerns were only for a subset of the population, one could agree with you if that subset were a small number.
However, that is far from the case. In fact, the numbers were so extensive that they had to change the long held definition of what a vaccine is, because these vaccines did not fit the existing definition.
The VAERS (vaccine adverse effects reporting system) contained over 30,000 deaths, and well over a million adverse effects, many of which the people experiencing them will be for their entire lifetime. Since the VAERS data is woefully & grossly underreported, due to varying reasons, these numbers represent only a portion of the true numbers. Some claim it to be 1%, while others claim 10%. This was even reported on by a study done by Harvard.
That means the numbers could be staggering, but in a climate of suppression of the truth that we have all witnessed, these numbers in VASERS itself present a very troubling story, even if we never get the true numbers.
But the real kicker, and one you totally ignored, was my statement that those who are looking at the documents are reporting that the trials themselves before being accepted foe EUA meant that they knew these vaccines were very dangerous and caused significant damage to people, including death.
Time to stop shilling for evil, an admit that they are evil. They only care about money. They are not in the business for anu humanitarian reasons at all. While some of the researchers may be in that business to do good & righteous work, they have no say whatsoever in the companies decisions. Those are the people who eventually decide to come out as whistleblowers.
That is fair.
Good catch.
The murderers are Big Pharma and Big Pharma shills.
Well said.
That explains why some of the people I have worked with have in the past have declined to provide citations.
Millions of lemmings are continuing to roll up their sleeves and eagerly get injected with poison.
Shills for the poison vax should get injected with it daily to prove their devotion to it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.