He said using marijuana was "not in and of itself a violent, forceful, or threatening act," and noted that Oklahoma is one of a number of states where the drug, still illegal under federal law, can be legally bought for medical uses.
Wyrick said that while the government can protect the public from dangerous people possessing guns, it could not argue Jared Harrison's "mere status as a user of marijuana justifies stripping him of his fundamental right to possess a firearm."
How about a ban on gun owners using marijuana?
Would that work?
It’s hard to continue the old objections, considering that functional alcohol users can legally own guns.
U.S. Supreme Court ruling that significantly expanded gun rights.“
F’n Reuters. The SC did not expand gun rights a-holes.
Good. It’s time for some sanity when it comes to drugs. Alcohol is far more dangerous.
No, it did not. It merely clarified the meaning of the 2nd Amendment. See Tagline.
Interesting. It will be appealed, of course, but if it stands that’s one little check box on the 4473 that’s going away.
Way I read second amendment is all American citizens have a right to keep and bear arms. I didn’t read of any limits
regardless of their bad habits.
If their habits cause problems then there is thing called quick due process to deprive them of their rights.
Y’all get it?
The whole crop of current federal gun regulations have no enumerated power backing them, they are all unconstitutional.
If only we didn’t have lawless jurists devoted to Arbitrary governance rather than the Law they swear to uphold.
There is a difference between saying drug users can’t have guns, and saying that people can’t use guns while under the influence of a mind altering drug. Including Alcohol.
BOOM! That’s MY president who appointed that judge!
The judge is right of course.
Let’s hear the Left object. The contortions they’ll go thru will be hilarious.
The fact anyone even wonders if such a ban is unconstitutional worries me.
What else will they use to ban people from their 2nd Amendment right?
Good decision by Judge Wyrick. I’m not a marijuana user myself, but there are many older people who use marijuana, often medically prescribed, to alleviate pain. They are otherwise law-abiding gun owners. They should not be penalized and prevented from exercising their Second Amendment rights for such usage. “Shall not be infringed” means just that!
The Judge is incorrect. The addict is incompetent, and the founders would have done the same.
Our governor already affirmed the 2nd Amendment rights of legal medical card holders such as myself. This was destined to fail. This is a 2nd Amendment Sanctuary State Deal with it
So the guy on youtube with the russian accent can start his channel back up? Get his guns back?
The law being struck down here, along with other similar laws across the country, are nothing more than gun control by another name.