Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What would happen if that balloon had been equipped with a nuke?

Posted on 02/04/2023 5:01:51 PM PST by Jonty30

I'm just wondering what might have happened if it had a nuclear payload and it was set to go off after dropping to 75,000 feet or so?


TOPICS: Computers/Internet; Conspiracy; Education; Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 next last
To: Jonty30
I'm just wondering what might have happened if it had a nuclear payload and it was set to go off after dropping to 75,000 feet or so?

Why would China set off a nuke over random shoreline near Charleston? So we'd go to war with China?

61 posted on 02/04/2023 6:07:50 PM PST by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

You underestimate the ability of the Chinese to encapsulate the biovirus weapons constituent gain of function parts which would infect wild and domestic animals first before finding a foot hold in the human population..

Perfect Chinese type plan, a whole nation defeated without a shot, all the people dead and all the buildings and resources still intact for occupation .


62 posted on 02/04/2023 6:10:36 PM PST by Candor7 ( ( Ask not for whom THE Trump trolls...He trolls for thee!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Regulator; All

Details, details

“Regrettable collateral damage” as the mil spokesdroids say
……….………………………….………………………….…………………

What blows my mind is how many people believe anything that comes from this administration. Biden says he ordered it shot down on Wednesday. If I’m not mistaken the news started reporting on it yesterday. I could be wrong.

But if Biden is actually telling the truth then that means they knew about probably Tuesday, maybe even Monday.

Worried about where it would land?? Look at all that wide open space it crossed.

They learned something from it. I guess stuff they couldn’t get when it was on the ground.

I read that a US plane, a few years ago, was forced to land in China. They sent it back in boxes from the story I was watching.


63 posted on 02/04/2023 6:11:10 PM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

This was a test or a dry run for something in the future. It doesn’t have to be a nuke. It can be an EMP or biological weapon. We don’t know what else China has been doing in their biological research of viruses. A lab in the US has developed a covid virus that kills 80% of the time. It is likely that China has developed the same virus in their labs.

A balloon might make a good delivery system for such a virus. Drop it over LA or or Seattle and let it do its thing.


64 posted on 02/04/2023 6:12:24 PM PST by Jonty30 (THE URGE TO SAVE THE WORLD IS ALMOST ALWAYS AN URGE TO RULE IT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
What would happen if that balloon had been equipped with a nuke?

This is the kind of thing that Wiley Coyote would do to Road Runner.

65 posted on 02/04/2023 6:12:29 PM PST by C210N (Everything will be okay in the end. If it’s not okay, it’s not the end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DownInFlames

Nay say. A nuclear weapon cannot be properly detonated through physical impact. The best you’d get is a dirty bomb.


66 posted on 02/04/2023 6:15:51 PM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Better yet how about Canada


67 posted on 02/04/2023 6:15:57 PM PST by al baby (Yes he did he said how come i wasnt invited )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Nay. EMP induced by a nuclear weapon does not cover a large area. Besides, EMP is generated only when detonated at the very fringes of space. That one wasn’t high enough.


68 posted on 02/04/2023 6:18:24 PM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: qaz123

You need to do more reading. A single nuke causes EMP damage within a very limited area around the blast. If a very high yield weapon is detonated at the fringe of space (much higher that the one you are talking about) you will have slightly wider spread affect. EMP is not the end of the world. Every lightning bolt makes EMP.


69 posted on 02/04/2023 6:21:35 PM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

Fallout is made by low altitude bursts, no high ones. The fallout is the dirt, buildings, and other things that get turned into dust. High bursts have no such medium with which to work.


70 posted on 02/04/2023 6:23:26 PM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Order the book “One Second After.” Pretty much sums it up. It’s a life changer. You’ve been warned.


71 posted on 02/04/2023 6:24:09 PM PST by Mathews (I have faith Malachi is right!!! Any day now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

EMP..
What if it were biological
What if it were chemical
What if it were a dirty radio active bomb

Point being we’d have been F if we’re any of these. Should have been destroyed before it got into ANY US territory.

A weak as President and a sad ass military and intelligence agency.


72 posted on 02/04/2023 6:30:26 PM PST by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

The shoot down was fake. They had already delivered their data load from the run and all that was shot down was junk. No data, surely it had alread been transmitted.

FAKE NEWS by a FAKE POTUS.


73 posted on 02/04/2023 6:36:15 PM PST by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frank ballenger

The EMP threat is only a modest danger, and only close to the point of detonation.


74 posted on 02/04/2023 6:36:26 PM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GingisK
A nuclear weapon cannot be properly detonated through physical impact.

Most nuclear weapons have an impact fuze as a backup if the main fuze fails. Yes, you get a dirty blast. But if you are targeting a hard target you will almost always get a dirty blast.

75 posted on 02/04/2023 6:39:02 PM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

I do not believe that at all.

Never have believed that.

“Experts” here want to argue the point. Accusing me of endangering millions of people, which is horse crap.

I refuse to accept it for fact and don’t buy their rage and arguments.


76 posted on 02/04/2023 6:39:18 PM PST by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

Well, you’re talking about 1.

Given this administrations response I’m not confident in any way shape or form.

While I’m glad you know more than me about an EMP, you describing technical specs doesn’t mean a whole lot. They know they can do it.

I think the Vietnam vets called it, probing.


77 posted on 02/04/2023 6:41:35 PM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

Yes, that all stands to reason. The hard targets require a on-target detonation; and, even a dud shouldn’t go to waste.


78 posted on 02/04/2023 6:42:58 PM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: qaz123

I think it was probing as well. The instrument package it carried probably got information that was unattainable using a satellite. Detectors for locating active missile silos come to mind. That information would have already been up-linked to a satellite long before it was shot down.


79 posted on 02/04/2023 6:47:56 PM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Not nearly high enough and would have to be a very large device to do anything of consequence


80 posted on 02/04/2023 6:56:40 PM PST by Manuel OKelley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson