Posted on 02/02/2023 6:17:30 PM PST by TonyinLA
May God protect us.
If you far enough from the initial blast and survive the heat and radiation, the first sign will be your internet is down. Everyone’s. Then the electricity stops. Forever. You’ll have no info, no fuel can be pumped, and your food rots. Then you starve, if you survive the marauders searching for food and weapons.
So good luck with that.
Again,
Biden Putin and Zelensky locked in an elevator
Then the cable is cut.
You guys must have hated Reagan.
WEF vs. Nationalism???
What could go wrong?
If you actually believe Elensky and Reagan belong in the same sentence, you have far bigger problems than a lack of analytical skill.
Why? I thought the deep state laundromat had this all but buttoned up.
I’m down. Sounds like a good time.
Ok, how does Reagan fit in here? I just had to ask.
I remember how freaked out people were.
Outlawing Russia forever.
Now go to your fainting couch.
Outlawing Russia forever.
And that is all we have. Amen.
He’s nuckin’ futs.
Worse from the standpoint of today’s Republican war lobby was Reagan’s response to the Polish crisis. Lech Walesa and the Solidarity movement were a global inspiration but the Polish military, fearing Soviet intervention, imposed martial law in 1981. Again, Reagan’s response was, well, appeasement. No bombers flew, no invasion threatened, no soldiers marched. He continued to contain Moscow and challenge its moral foundation. But like Dwight Eisenhower in 1953 and 1956 and Lyndon Johnson in 1968, Reagan did not risk a general war to help liberate Eastern Europeans when they opposed Soviet troops. Indeed, from Reagan came no military moves, no aggressive threats, no economic sanctions. Reagan did little other than wait for the Evil Empire to further deteriorate from within.
Little other than talk, that is. Reagan wanted to negotiate from a position of strength, but he wanted to negotiate. And despite his image as a crazed cowboy and mad Cold Warrior, he negotiated over arms reduction with … the Soviet Union. For example, he used the deployment of intermediate-range nuclear missiles to win the withdrawal of both nations’ weapons.
from 1983 onward, Reagan devoted more of his foreign policy time to arms control than to any other subject.” Reagan spoke of peace when he addressed Soviet students in Moscow in 1988. Norman Podhoretz, the neocon godfather, denounced Reagan for “appeasement by any other name.”
Reagan was willing to switch rhetoric and policy when circumstances changed, in this case, the nature of the Soviet regime. He had no illusions, unlike some observers, that enjoying jazz made former KGB chief Yuri Andropov, who replaced Brezhnev, into a closet liberal. In contrast, Reagan understood that Mikhail Gorbachev was different. A reform Communist, Gorbachev nevertheless humanized the system and kept the military in its barracks. Reagan worked with the Soviet leader, despite heartfelt criticism from his own staffers and fevered denunciations from activists—dissention that Reagan acknowledged in his diary. Gorbachev later wrote that Reagan “was looking for negotiations and cooperation.” Or, in a word, appeasement.
Reagan used the military in combat only three times, and not to impose democracy, rebuild failed states or overthrow dictators.
https://nationalinterest.org/feature/betrayed-why-reagan-would-be-ashamed-the-neocons-12732
The requests/demands keep escalating. Seems to imply that Ukraine is starting to lose the conflict.
Probably has SloJoe over a barrel, so who the hell knows what is going to happen.
They still hate Reagan.
I’ve seen Gilligan’s Island, I can survive.
That Russia was the USSR. This is not that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.