Posted on 01/25/2023 10:49:35 AM PST by grundle
The UK ONS admitted that the misinformation spreaders got it right and their stats are wrong. Which means that the COVID vaccine might not be helpful after all.
Executive summary
Norman Fenton, Martin Neil, Clare Craig and Scott McLachlan authored a letter to the UK Office of National Statistics (ONS) pointing out serious flaws in their data. These flaws would make the unvaccinated look worse than they really are.
The regulator agreed they were right.
[Editor’s note: An honest regulator is a rarity. This would NEVER happen in the US.]
Bottom line: The UK government can’t prove the vaccines work. Nobody else can use their data to prove that the vaccines work. But we can use the data to prove the vaccines don’t work. Stay tuned… Introduction
I’ve written previously about how the UK ONS data is unreliable and inconsistent:
If the UK government believes it's own data, it should tell people not to get vaccinated
Why the UK ONS data shouldn't be used to justify public policy
The UK government's official data shows they are killing their children
New UK government data shows the COVID vaccines kill more people than they save
But I don’t think any of the “debunkers” or “fact checkers” have noticed any of these flaws. Am I wrong?
Now, a group of “misinformation spreaders” have formally pointed out the errors and called for the data to be corrected.
The good thing is the regulator was honest and agreed with the group. What this means
You can’t use the UK ONS data to argue the vaccine is safe or effective.
With all its resources the ONS still cannot provide any evidence the vaccines have any benefit at all.
We can use the UK data to prove the vaccines increase all-cause mortality and should be stopped. This is happening as we speak.
In the meantime, may I suggest you ponder these two graphs before getting any more boosters?
Both show getting additional boosters is stupid. Beyond stupid.
and
Summary
The UK ONS statistics can no longer be used to show the vaccines work. But they can be used to prove that the vaccines cause more harm than good. Stay tuned. It will not turn out well for the vaccine makers.
The FAA increased the safety of the vaxx jabs by lowering cardiac standards.
Dugway Dufus ain’t gonna like this.
Ping
Brits, more honest than Americans.
never trust a government and medical community that claims men can cut off their family jewels and convert to women...
I have a friend that I don’t see often, maybe once a year if our schedules sync up, and she told me that she just got her latest booster days before. I didn’t have the heart to ask her why she did that. We all know the answer. It’s because she’s afraid (no comorbidities, so I really don’t get it), or is terribly misinformed. I want to keep her as a friend, so I will not say anything. I hope she stays healthy.
Our only hope is that American hubris is enough for large western nations to say, “Enough!” They’re all towing the line for the WEF but eventually someone will speak out against American pharma hegemony.
So once again, these guys will conflate different time periods, different events, different data sets, etc. to make a nonexistent point about vaccines and whether they were ever effective. And now this article from the infamous Steve Kirsch, long time purveyor of fake garbage like recycling a months old debunked fake news article about the courts ruling that taking the vaccine was the equivalent under law of “suicide.” And yet he is still posted as credible by these people.
Same old, same old. And the same posters will act like they’ve really got something this time who don’t have a clue what they are talking about and even years later haven’t bothered to learn or do even basic research. The other day they were giddy with excitement over “proof” that mRNA in general is harmful - obviously don’t have a clue what mRNA is, and another article was about a vaccine did not use mRNA...at all...as proof they were right. Of course if you point this out you are a “deep state propagandist.” Reality has never registered with these people. The Left made over. Feelings over facts, narrative over truth.
Don't worry, I'm sure he'll be along any minute now to lecture us all about how we're too stupid to understand, how we're "misreading" the data, etc.
Are you keeping up with your booster clot shots? Isn’t it time for you to get another because the are pushing for getting “boosted” every 2 months. Get on it!
How many boosters are you planning on taking?
>> these guys will conflate different time periods
will or did?
The domain of second chart seems to be from Jan 2022. The first chart doesn’t specify the “start of the study”, so I can’t tell if the time domains sufficiently overlap.
I wish an article would at least show what an abbreviation stands for instead of assuming readers ( who aren’t from the UK ) know it.
So, here it is — what does ONS stand for?
That’s what Bill Gates said in a video I saw yesterday.
Must be the new narrative, coupled with blaming pure-bloods...
ONS = Office of National Statistics
Don’t forget Gas_Bag
It’s Not A Booster. It is The 4th, 5th, 6th etc. Shot Of A Product That Already Failed Multiple Times.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.