Posted on 01/18/2023 2:50:02 AM PST by C19fan
A relationship expert has defended people having sex on a first date, with almost half of Aussies admitting to doing the deed straight away.
Relationship, sex, and mental health therapist Rachel Wright, from New York, said there is no 'right time' to have sex with a new partner and going for it on the first date can quickly determine if you want to continue the relationship.
According to a study, 49 per cent of participants said they have slept with someone on the first date, with those who don't saying they prefer to establish an emotional connection before getting into bed.
Relationship expert Rachel Wright said there are benefits to having sex on the first date as a new study found almost half of the participants said they have the deed right away
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Yeah, you’d hit it...along with everyone else and their
brother.
Just remember, you’re not only having sex with her but
with all those “brothers”...
I’m lucky, I’m too old to hit it, anyway I’d rather
have a dog but I don’t have one of those either.
If you don't ask you don't get.
I think there is a difference between the terms ‘double standards’ and ‘different standards’.
As you say, ‘double standards’ tends to look a lot like hypocrisy whereas ‘different standards’ does not.
In the parable of Jesus and the Adulteress, we don’t see Jesus looking for the man also involved in the affair.
Different standards or double standards?
The Catholic Church lays the burden on the woman to be responsible for saying ‘No’ when it comes to sex. Double, or different?
I think most philosophies understand the innate sex urges that drive most males and have tailored their cultures to survive the human storm. Women are asked to be stronger in saying no because they, as you say, have more sense in the matter when things get hot and lusty. Men are expected to concede to the woman’s wishes. Doesn’t always hold, but that is life.
I think you must be projecting.
why bother with marriage?
Getting married in June, we are a great match after 3 years of dating.
“I imagine that hanging around the Men’s Room down at the bus station at 2 in the morning, propositioning the shadowy characters skulking around there, can get to be a drag, sometimes!”
If that what more sex means for you, you may want to seek help.
I would think I would like to get to know the woman first before getting into bed with her. I used to consider getting a kiss on the first date a success. How the world has changed.
Chelsea has a younger sister? I guess bill lived by sex on the first date...or not even a date..or even if the women didn’t want it...
Yes, double standards. Different standards are double standards.
In the account of the adulteress, Jesus forgave her. Why would you expect that He would go looking for the man?
The pharisees brought the woman who was caught in the act.
Well, if she was caught in the act, then where was the guy? They would have, and should have, nailed him, too, and yet they didn’t.
OT law demanded the same penalty for both men and women who engaged in adultery. That Jesus didn’t go ferret out the man is not relevant to what is being discussed, and that is that God’s standards apply equally to both.
The Catholic church is then hypocritical because of laying the responsibility of being morally pure on the man and having him set the standard for morals in society and the culture, they wink at it and lay then responsibility on the woman to say no.
It is not women’s place to make men behave themselves even though they have to do it.. It is the man’s place to control himself and PROTECT the woman from being taken advantage of. That is a man’s role, to be provider and protector, not the person whom women should be having to protect themselves against.
Men have flat out abdicated their responsibility for moral integrity before God, and have therefore no basis for complaint when they reap what they have sowed.
It may be life, but it is wrong morally.
Does the Bible say anything about this?
***********
(looks in his Bible) *gasp* My goodness! It DOES!!
And find out if it is actually a women, too.
Wake up to find you slept with a walking STD? No thanks. Besides, in the absence of love, it's just rutting.
If there is no God, we are free to make up all the rules we like. Ergo, there can be no moral/immoral correlation to intercourse at all. Like a handshake. Like a pat on the back. Intercourse is just another ho hum “human “connection”, and has nothing to do with right or wrong. Making sex a moral/immoral matter is just a way of parents not wanting their children to not have fun.
Don’t be a fuddy duddy. Sex sex sex. Do it every where you want. Do it with everybody.
(Is the sarcasm tag needed?)
However, it is very rare that a man gets a sex change and actually looks anything like an attractive woman. They almost always end up looking like old ladies with a hormone imbalance, have husky voices and they just don't have the correct feminine mannerisms down.
I don't know why they even bother, to tell you the truth. If a man could make himself look like a hot woman, I can sort of understand, the the end result is never anything close to that, unless you have an army of beauticians at your disposal like that Bruce Jenner. I would say of all the sex change people, Bruce could fool me in a smoky bar. But I'd still need to have a few drinks in me before I take him home.
I take it you have never been to Bangkok. You have to be careful; always look for the Adam's apple.
I want to know how many divorces has she had?
Also she shows right off she’s not a God fearing woman
Never been to Bangkok and likely never will!
Precisely
Sure if there is no God why not be selfish and hedonistic. Might as well go all the way and go homo while you're at it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.