[escapefromboston]

Ukraine must lose to prevent further aggression from NATO

[Boogieman]

“to prevent further aggression from NATO”

Ah yes, because we all remember the countless countries that NATO has invaded and forcibly annexed.

[Cronos]

What aggression from NATO towards Russia?

[Alas Babylon!]

NATO did no such thing. Politically, Obama and Biden used it as a bank to skim off $$$ due to blatant government corruption. At best, Obama dangeled the carrot of arms to get them to play ball. Trump stopped that game, and even tually sold them arms, not just promising them the same.

They got rid of Trump, and Joe went back to the same old, same old.

It’s always been American democrats meddling, not NATO.

Learn the difference.

If Trump was back in office this would change immediately, while NATO would remain the same.

[Petrosius]

Ukraine must lose to prevent further aggression from NATO

Yes, we all remember that NATO aggression when Ukraine sent its tanks across the border into Russia. Oh, wait …

[Kazan]

Wise words. I agree.

[ought-six]

“Ukraine must lose to prevent further aggression from NATO.”

I must have missed something: When did NATO aggress Russia, such that Russia felt compelled to prevent any further aggression from NATO?

By your logic, Russia is punishing Ukraine for something Russia claims NATO did, and Ukraine is not now and never has been a member of NATO.

I guess maybe it makes sense in Russia-speak.