Posted on 01/09/2023 6:56:56 PM PST by semimojo
Compared to vaccinated folks who had NOT gotten bivalent:
Older folks who got the bivalent had 81% reduction in hospitalizations 86% reduction in deaths
I gotta song (unfinished) called, WUHAN VACCINE AGAIN (played to the tune of “Werewolves of London”).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvN56FD6-vg
Common, everybody sing along…
(Second verse)
You hear them howling around your kitchen door.
Better not let them in.
Young people dropping like flies
Wuhan Vaccine again
Aah-hoo Wuhan Vaccine
Aah-hoo
Aah-hoo Wuhan Vaccine
Aah-hoo… huh!
(Middle of third verse)
You better stay away from them
They’ll clog your arteries Jim
I’d like to meet their accountants
Aah-hoo Wuhan Vaccine
Aah-hoo
Aah-hoo Wuhan Vaccine
Aah-hoo…
I saw a Globalist walking with the Queen
Doing the Wuhan Vaccine
I saw the son of a Globalist walking with the Queen
Doing the Wuhan Vaccine
Aah-hoo Wuhan Vaccine
Aah-hoo
Aah-hoo Wuhan Vaccine
Aah-hoo…
What about not vaccinated people?
So what about after that?
Not addressed? We're supposed to just be shot up every 70 days?
What about the absolute numbers?
1 is close to an 86% reduction of 2.
Also interesting they limit it to those 65 and older.
I’d like to know as well.
86% reduction in mortality in patients 65 or older works for me
This Israeli study didn't look at that but there's a wealth of data here:
Rates of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 hospitalizations by vaccination status
In November hospitalizations were 16X higher in the unvaccinated.
"A total of 622,701 participants met the eligibility criteria. Of those, 85,314 (14%) received a bivalent-booster during the 70-day study period. Hospitalization due to Covid-19 occurred in 6 bivalent recipients and 297 participants who did not.
So you're willing to be shot up, every ~2 months, for something you might not even catch?
Tiny. There's 5 (five) periods of that length in a single year. So you'd need 5 shots to just make it through a year, to maintain that level of effectiveness, best case.
Where are the results regarding the dangers of taking this shot, every 70 days?
Thanks.
Seems like definitive numbers, though both a very low number of the study population.
True. You'll be dealing with very low overall hospitalization rates with a vaccinated population like this.
Not only is the Covid mRNA vaccine a death jab, but Lancet is without any credibility due to their past misconduct.
.... and what are the effects of that on the immune system?...
I can see where the 86% number comes from.
Both hospitalization percentages are very low
Now I suppose this analysis has to factor in Age, Sex, and “preexisting” conditions, plus perhaps more factors.
Only if you have a very high deployment rate.
A deployment rate that equals distributed shots to most Americans every 70 days.
Not realistic, to say the least. Independent of the unknown dangers of a shot rate reaching that frequency, which you haven't yet addressed.
I don't think so.
This retrospective cohort study included all members of Clalit Health Services, aged ≥65, eligible for a bivalent booster.
It doesn't look like they did much additional screening. I don't know what the booster eligibility requirements are in Israel but it's usually only that it's been long enough since your last shot.
It's time to admin you and this study weren't ready for prime time analysis.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.