Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The military duty to disobey
American Thinker ^ | 18 Dec, 2022 | Robert Arvay

Posted on 12/18/2022 2:23:33 PM PST by MtnClimber

There is a well-known requirement in the United States armed forces that all who serve in it are required to obey the orders of their superior officers. This is only common sense. No military organization could long survive if those in it could choose which orders they would obey, and which to ignore.

There is, however, an exception to this rule of obedience, and it has significant ramifications: no one is required to obey an illegal order, such as an order to clearly break the law. Indeed, there is an unofficial doctrine called the “duty to disobey.” This also is common sense. No military organization could long survive if its commanders decided which laws to follow.

Of course, in civilian employment, the employee has a contractual duty to obey his employer, but this is of a very different nature than in the military. The worst that the employer can do is to fire the employee. The employee has the option to walk away. In the armed forces, disobedience can result in court martial, with incarceration in a federal prison, up to a life sentence. In the extreme, the death penalty could be imposed. XYZ company has no such authority, of course.

One thing in common, both in the military and civilian environments, is that obedience to an illegal order can—again, common sense—subject the subordinate to the same penalty as if he had broken the law of his own accord. The most iconic example of this is the Nuremberg war crimes trials, involving genocide, in which the defendants infamously relied on the defense that they were only obeying orders. The prosecution claimed, successfully, that the defendants had a duty to disobey illegal orders. Some were put to death. The precedent has stood ever since, putting despots on notice worldwide.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Military/Veterans; Society
KEYWORDS: constitution; illegalorders
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: MtnClimber

Lay down your arms. Go home.

America is no longer worth fighting for.


21 posted on 12/18/2022 11:54:53 PM PST by NoLibZone (Ruling class noticed our total lack of pushback for how the election & Covid was handled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: utahb52

your right. As it was explained to us in OCS. What constitutes an illegal order will be determined at your General Court Marshal.


22 posted on 12/19/2022 4:07:16 AM PST by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: utahb52
However, the burden of proof that an order is not lawful will generally be on the individual.

Yes but one phone call to the Area Defense Council (ADC) can put it on them.

Witnessed a few of those. More than once the ADC went and slapped some squadron commander for an unlawful order they or one of their subordinates had issued.

23 posted on 12/19/2022 5:38:08 AM PST by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Enemies foreign and Domestic (if I recall my oath correctly).


24 posted on 12/19/2022 5:49:12 AM PST by Harpotoo (Being a socialist is a lot easier than having to WORK like the rest of US:-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson