You tell a compelling story and then conclude that Thor bang does by the mechanism they feared. You leave no room for error in your pronouncement.
The chances that clot as described in the timelines indicated came from vaccinated blood is essentially zero. Based on all the evidence of millions of transfused units from nearly a billion doses without incident. You can provide no response to this
Do me a favor. Research extracorporeal circulation in neonatal cardiac surgery and get back to me. Please comment on the degree of coagulation with this technique and risk for thrombus.
This child died from severe anatomical deficiencies even with heroic surgical intervention. Look the the incidence of death for this pathology and this disease.
Weigh that against the evidence. Draw a conclusion. Then we can talk.
Try to be a little curious instead of making every narrative for your agenda. For example the reported who died at the World Cup that everyone of certain beliefs ran out and called PROOF of another vaccine death — was a ruptured aneurysm. I just wonder at what point we hear how good tasting the egg on face is when this happens — which is more often than not
If being a troll is called questioning what appears to be bull crap
Then I am guilty as charged.
Talk to the doctors AT THAT HOSPITAL.
From the article YOU SUGGESTED I READ:
While the surgery itself did not require blood, Dr. Eleane Beadle determined that Alexander needed a blood transfusion the next day due to low hemoglobin levels.“Instead of waiting a few more days for the blood we had donated to be fully processed and available,” the doctor used blood from a general blood bank for the transfusion, Bly told Clary.<
Wikins has pointed out that Washington “had a 70% fully-vaccinated population by February 1, 2022, with 79% receiving at least one injection,” and so “there was a near 80% chance Alexander got vaxxed blood.”
The doctor “found the blood clot within a few hours after he got the transfusion,” Hertzler told Clary on Thursday.
Hertzler said that while previously, the doctors had told them that “blood clots are very rare” in a case like Alexander’s, after he got a blood clot, they said, “Well, this happens. But…it’s something a blood thinner can fix.”
“And the blood thinners — they had him on the highest dose they could give an infant. And it did nothing. [The clot] just kept growing really fast,” she went on.
Hertzler believes that if the clot had been “normal,” then blood thinners would have helped dissolve it. She said that, “given our understanding” of the findgs of abnormal clots in the vaxxed deceased, “we know that it’s not a normal blood clot.”
Got that? The blood clot wasn't during the second surgery.
The transfusion was given a day AFTER the surgery, due to low hemoglobin.
The clot came AFTER THE TRANSFUSION, not right after the surgery.
And to bolster that last point, the ATTENDING PHYSICIAN said *prior to the procedure* that blood clots were very low in a case like the now dead-baby's situation.
So again, it's not a case of "ignorant rube speaking like a medieval peasant about matters they don't know anything about".
It's a case of the attending doctors in the case (so you can't argue, well, physicians can shoot of their mouths, a remote commenter isn't really familiar with all the facts of the case) saying "blood clots are very rare".
And the clot happening not during or immediately after the procedure itself, but after the later transfusion.
Where the hospital pressured and lied to the parents it would be too difficult and too costly to use a directed donor.
Oh yeah, just to remind you again.
YOUR article, which YOU told me to read before commenting.
Troll.
In recent years more success has been realized in mature Patients but perhaps that is because they treatment has been expanded greatly and so the results have demonstrated more positive ends. That and advancements have been realized. Still, most recipients of this method of treatment are not provided with significantly extended life spans, certainly not to my knowledge. If one needs to have their blood moved outside of their body for ‘fixing’ then it is almost certainly prudent to have a last Will and Testament organized, registered, and in proper order.
Regarding blood transfusions, since the GRID AKA AIDS epidemic of 4 decades ago came onto the scene it was recognized that blood transfusions are inherently dangerous.
These days, in order to receive a transfusion a Patient must sign a waiver acknowledging that transfused blood cannot be guaranteed to be 100% safe from viral infection. Of course a baby cannot give consent. In the case discussed here, the parents demanded untainted blood. The hospital seems to have not complied with that ‘request.’ The hospital is liable for the death of this baby. They might have just let the baby croak on its own, but they pushed in the blood with thrombotic issues contrary to the wishes and insistence of the family. This is a crime.
How could you defend that?