Posted on 12/16/2022 7:20:31 PM PST by NetAddicted
Here is a quick link I found, there were others, but it is time for me to go to sleep. Feel free to search further. I don’t think this was as definitive as the material I saw earlier. Do we still trust Lancet?
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(21)00054-7/fulltext
If anyone is ‘moving the goal posts’ around here dimwit, its you.
Your claim that the blood of vaccinated people causes blood clots in transfusion recipients is false.
Now either provide evidence to the contrary or shut your vile mouth.
Where is your evidence that the nations blood supply isn't safe because donors have been vaccinated?
Scroll down to...
3. SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination-Associated Coagulopathy
...for the vaxx-related issues.
A Case of Leukocytoclastic Vasculitis Following SARS-COV-2 Vaccination
...for this tidbit of info...
...Leukocytoclastic vasculitis (LCV) is a small-vessel vasculitiI... that has been associated with other immunizations, but, to our knowledge, has not been previously reported in association with vaccines directed against SARS-CoV-2.
Bold is mine.
BTW, if your healthcare providers have never done a risk/benefit analysis with you in regard to any/all the vaxxes they're pushing, you're not alone.
Mostly fat fingers and little keyboard on iPhone. ARDS Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Defined as Pa/Fi of oxygen gradient <200:1
OPCAB off pump CABG. Not at lot of fun to anesthetize. My guess is that this operation (chick was airlifted to academic center or at least a tertiary care center with peds hearts) with RVDO and TEF requires pretty emergent surgery. It’s not like this was a elective knee replacement.
As for the rest of it. There is zero evidence as to vaccinated donors causing prothrombotic events. The real issue here is there was probably a large femoral venous thrombosis because that is where they cannulate for venous drainage in pediatric pump cases. Grey Whiskers could not answer that question nor anyone else because the have zero idea what actually went on. There are about a million reasons for this kid to have thrombosis of the femoral veins and if it is correct although the parents interview is suspect extension to the IVC. The presence of MRSA either excludes in its entirety that this clot was caused by the transfusion or suggests MRSA septicemia was the cause. In either event it wasn’t the transfusion.
That is why I asked the questions I did to see if anyone out there actually understood what really happened. Everyone with an agenda stated this one case proves their theory beyond a doubt. It simply does not.
But disagree with it and the pseudo ministers of the faith call you a demonic sociopath. The reasons I ask the questions I do is to illustrate the lack of critical thinking and fundamental understanding of the fringe element (and yea they are fringe. Very few people are talking of pure bloods and he rest of the nonsense) as this is simply not an issue. Over a billion doses give to over 250 million people in America. Trust me. We’re this a clinical issue it would have been abundantly evident by now.
vs.
A baby whose parents wanted the baby to receive unjabbed blood
but who had their chains yanked by
(pick one or more) a) greedy; b) power-mad; c) control-freak; d) stupid; e) complicit in depopulation
administrators and doctors
which doctors TOLD the parents the risk of clots from THE PROCEDURE the baby had is rare
then performed the procedure on the baby
and the baby had low hemoglobin but no mention of clots during or after the procedure
but the baby then developed clots AFTER the jabbed blood was transfused
and then the same doctors told the parents "It's OK because Blood Thinners because SCIENCE!™"
but the blood thinners didn't work
and the baby DIED just as the parents had feared
and blaming the parents for pushing for non-jabbed blood
and for being crazy religious fundamentalists
even though they did the operation the doctors wanted
even though the baby who died got the jabbed blood the doctors wanted anyway
and the blood donation wasn't even delayed
but you want to insist that (insert esoteric description of links to general survey articles about risks of clotting from said procedures)
*PROVES* that the extensive clot from knee to heart
which killed the baby
came from the Medical Procedure™
and "well these things happen Medicine isn't an exact SCIENCE™"
(but the doctors are GODS anyway)
and now the doctors are talking about MRSA attaching to the clot
even though MRSA is a well-known nosocomial infection in a hospital setting anyway
as though that lack of cleanliness
which the doctors say killed the baby
(but it's really the parents' fault because reasons *cough* religious fanatics *cough*)
somehow improves the credibility of the doctors.
The most you can say is by the null hypothesis you ASSUME no linkage in the absence of a double-blind randomized statistical trial. And what I say back isn't printable. And the Pelosi / McConnell you rode in on troll.
Welcome to the majority of the anti COVID-19 vaccination threads, where people dying are used to advance the narrative.
Another giveaway that FRoctors are on the loose.
Here's the relevant questions.
1) Location of clots
What is the the typical constellation of symptoms for MRSA infection introduced into the bloodstream? Does it include clotting? If so, is there a typical description of the clotting, i.e. is it proximal to the needle injection site, or downstream of where the MRSA-carrying blood enters the body?
Or is it systemic with no focal point? Or does it typically start clotting in a particular organ (heart, or lungs, or kidneys)? Or in extremities? Or at joints?
2) Timing of clots
How long after the MRSA enters the blood, does it take for clots to start forming?
How does one distinguish clots formed as a side effect of the procedure itself, to clots formed as a result of MRSA infection?
3) Amenability of clots to treatment
What blood thinners are typically used on MRSA clots?
What dosage?
Is the successful resolution of clots dependent on the size of clots when blood thinners are first given?
Is it necessary to clear the system of MRSA before clots resolve?
Or can it happen "the clots went away but the remaining MRSA killed the patient anyway" ?
4) Physiochemical characteristics of clots
Do the clots in the dead baby look typical of the abnormal clots reported in dead jab recipients by embalmers and doctors who are honest enough to come public about these things?
5) Is there such a thing as introducing MRSA during the transfusion? The only symptom mentioned in the article the day after the medical procedure (for which, remember, the attending physician said clots are "rare" -- what a loaded term; the articles I looked up suggested up to about 10% incidence of clots, which is a convenient level for argument in that you can simultaneously defend the doctor calling them rare, but use the 10% as a cudgel for presumptively arguing the clots must have come from the procedure) -- the only symptom mentioned was a low hemoglobin count. Is that a early symptom of clotting, or of MRSA infection?
Just shouting "I'm a DOCTOR" doesn't cut the mustard.
Hat tip to freepersup:
The most terrifying force of death comes from the hands of “Men who wanted to be left Alone.”
They try, so very hard, to mind their own business and provide for themselves and those they love.
They resist every impulse to fight back, knowing the forced and permanent change of life that will come from it.
They know, that the moment they fight back, their lives as they have lived them, are over.
The moment the “Men who wanted to be left Alone” are forced to fight back, it is a small form of suicide. They are literally killing off who they used to be.
This is why, when forced to take up violence, these “Men who wanted to be left Alone,” fight with unholy vengeance against those who murdered their former lives. They fight with raw hate and a drive that cannot be fathomed by those who are merely play-acting at politics and terror. TRUE TERROR will arrive at the Left’s door, and they will cry, scream, and beg for mercy... but it will fall upon deaf ears.“
Author Unknown
Once you take a swing at my questions I will answer yours. However all your questions are diversions and nonsense
You're a fine old Freeper, I read your posts regularly, and I apologize for having a snit.
This is as far back as I have been able to trace your quote.
This is as far back as I could find a video recording of it.
The Man Who Just Wanted To Be Left Alone (Jan 27, 2022)
https://rumble.com/vtfxdw-the-man-who-just-wanted-to-be-left-alone.html
Was not my quote.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.