Replies

Get stuffed. The most you have is "the wholly corrupted medical profession which covered up the known harms from the clot shots,
which showed up even in the woefully inadequate trials
and which they sought to have sealed by court order for 75 years
and which profession also covered up ongoing harms from the clot shots
and which forbade the use or prescription of cheap OTC medicines which have been around for decades
and which were more effective than the clot shots
and which had far fewer side effects
said profession now DECREES that it is impossible that jabbed blood can possibly carry any risk to the recipient
without performing any systematic controlled study"

vs.

A baby whose parents wanted the baby to receive unjabbed blood
but who had their chains yanked by

(pick one or more) a) greedy; b) power-mad; c) control-freak; d) stupid; e) complicit in depopulation
administrators and doctors
which doctors TOLD the parents the risk of clots from THE PROCEDURE the baby had is rare
then performed the procedure on the baby
and the baby had low hemoglobin but no mention of clots during or after the procedure
but the baby then developed clots AFTER the jabbed blood was transfused
and then the same doctors told the parents "It's OK because Blood Thinners because SCIENCE!™"
but the blood thinners didn't work
and the baby DIED just as the parents had feared
and blaming the parents for pushing for non-jabbed blood
and for being crazy religious fundamentalists
even though they did the operation the doctors wanted
even though the baby who died got the jabbed blood the doctors wanted anyway
and the blood donation wasn't even delayed
but you want to insist that (insert esoteric description of links to general survey articles about risks of clotting from said procedures)
*PROVES* that the extensive clot from knee to heart
which killed the baby
came from the Medical Procedure™
and "well these things happen Medicine isn't an exact SCIENCE™"
(but the doctors are GODS anyway)
and now the doctors are talking about MRSA attaching to the clot
even though MRSA is a well-known nosocomial infection in a hospital setting anyway
as though that lack of cleanliness
which the doctors say killed the baby
(but it's really the parents' fault because reasons *cough* religious fanatics *cough*)
somehow improves the credibility of the doctors.

The most you can say is by the null hypothesis you ASSUME no linkage in the absence of a double-blind randomized statistical trial. And what I say back isn't printable. And the Pelosi / McConnell you rode in on troll.

Your claim that the blood of vaccinated people causes blood clots in transfusion recipients is false.

Here's a start.

The jab which you trolls swore was safe and effective, is now admitted by the FDA to cause blood clots in recipients.

You might consider it a necessary precondition, to the idea it causes clots in those receiving blood from the jabbed.

Are you in favor of unrestricted blood donation by homosexuals, by the way?