To: BenLurkin
I highly doubt the thing was made of glass. Almost certainly some sort of acrylic
To: HamiltonJay
I highly doubt the thing was made of glass. Almost certainly some sort of acrylic Almost certainly. But it may have also had some glass components and I'd wager some of the surrounding building glass windows and balconies got blown out as a result of the sudden release.
11 posted on
12/16/2022 5:14:47 PM PST by
fidelis
(👈 Under no obligation to respond to rude, ignorant, abusive, bellicose, and obnoxious posts.)
To: HamiltonJay
Acrylic ages much more quickly than glass.
Exposure to sunlight accelerates aging.
How long had this been in place?
13 posted on
12/16/2022 5:15:28 PM PST by
Ex gun maker.
(Free thinking is now a radical concept, I will not be assimilated by PC or EV groupthink!)
To: HamiltonJay
I would think so, too. I can’t imagine the furnace to heat a +50 foot high tank made of glass. Acrylic is a two part polymer that is simply poured.
14 posted on
12/16/2022 5:17:42 PM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(Inside every leftist is a blood-thirsty fascist yearning to be free of current societal constraints.)
To: HamiltonJay
It certainly looked like acrylic to me. Glass usually does not have big pieces intact after giving way and falling to the ground.
I wonder if the tank was new or had been there for awhile? Article didn't say, or I missed it.
To: HamiltonJay
Still no doubt some of that renouned Cherman engineering? If you lose a war bad enough you ought to be kind of humble for awhile?
To: HamiltonJay
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson