This is prima-facie evidence that the more monovalent shots people had, the less protected they were.
To reiterate: Vaccination with the monovalent booster resulted in negative effectiveness. The greater the number of doses, the greater the risk of contracting COVID-19. This constitutes a dose-dependent effect, one of the hallmarks of causality.
As stated above, the effectiveness of the bivalent booster across all ages and prior monovalent doses was a mere 9% compared to those who were unvaccinated. It is thus reasonable to conclude that the bivalent booster does little more than restore immunity to pre-vaccination levels.
And this meager 9% protection is not without cost. These mRNA products have far higher rates of severe adverse reactions, including death, than any vaccines in the past.
Ping
What a joke.
Covid jabs.. I guess killing people isn’t exactly good for the cause.
But, wait. The commercials all say how great it is. Spit.
It’s not about health and prevention of diseases. It’s about the money. The CDC et al should go to the bathroom with a 38 pistol and do the honorable thing. IMO
Science is anti-science!
Safe and effective, baby, safe and effective.
This is a pandemic of the UNvaccinated. Say it again.
This is a pandemic of the UNvaccinated. Say it again.
This is a pandemic of the UNvaccinated. Say it again.
This is a pandemic of the UNvaccinated. Say it again.
Wholly agree, based on reading both the US and European data.
CDC, FDA, Pfizer,etc.....NONE of em have a modicum of credibility any more.
Nada...NONE.
They can take all their jabs and shove em right, straight, square up their gay little arses good and hard...and sideways.
Insanity is repeatedly doing the same thing and expecting a different outcome. There never was a COVID vaccine. It’s an experimental gene therapy. We are just learning some of the harms it causes.
Pfizer, the Yugo of pharmacy.
“Why pay for testing out stuff ourselves when you’re out there and bend over for DemocRATs?”
Q. What’s the difference between Kyle Rittenhouse and Pfizer?
A. Rittenhouse’s shots worked.
Much of this garbage would stop if advertising prescription medication were banned on TV, mach like cigarettes were banned from advertising.
When you see an ad that says, “Ask your Doctor about XYZ”, and there is no information in the ad about what XYZ is even for, you’re watching a bribe being paid by Big Pharma to the media so the media will think twice about any negative reporting about big Pharma.
One thing, at least, should now be dead certain: These shots are causing Antibody Dependent Enhancement, just as those like Dr. Malone, Dr. Vanden Bossche, and others predicted. Anyone who still takes them after all of the information we have now is just a willfully blind fool. It’s simple: ADE means that these “vaccines” actually INCREASE your risk of contracting COVID, being hospitalized, or dying from it. And the more you take, the worse it gets. And that’s not even counting the slew of dangerous potential side effects. Who in their right mind would sign up for that?
“A few months after vaccination, the vaccinated are more likely to get COVID-19 than the unvaccinated.”
The negative efficacy seem to me to be a pretty clear signal of immune system damage or dysfunction, and I’d bet the effect is cumulative for each of these shots a person gets.
What is a bivalent booster and a monovalent booster?
p
You mean like a soccer player?