Posted on 11/20/2022 9:21:18 AM PST by zeestephen
Elevated levels of CO2 make it difficult for plants to obtain the minerals necessary to grow and provide nutritious food..."Two main nutrients that are essential for human nutrition may be affected by this phenomenon. The first one is proteins built from nitrogen. The second one is iron."
(Excerpt) Read more at scitechdaily.com ...
I understand the trees that grow fast tend to be less dense and more porous. I could imagine a similar phenomenon in all plants. The CO2 allows them to grow faster and so there is less time for them to take up minerals, i.e. less mineral dense.
So that means grass clipping burgers and chicken (plant) nuggets aren’t nutritious either. All they’re good for is to get rid of the grass clippings.
I call NS. Fear porn from the left
The authors
Alain Gojon
Océane Cassan
Liên Bach
Laurence Lejay
Antoine Martin
are dumbasses with an agenda.
Turns out they have global global atmospheric CO2 measurements that mirror Moana Lua.
You can click on the image to be taken to the source documentation.
What's the next straw you want to grasp at?
Let’s cut to the important thing...does this mean my lawn will not be a dark, luxurious green color? Will the weeds thrive more than usual and out-compete my bluegrass? On the other hand, will my lawn grow more slowly and need less mowing? That could mean more time for golf. But what about the deer that graze on my lawn as winter sets in and they start getting real hungry? If my grass is less nutritious, will some of those 26 giant rats die?
It’s all so complicated.
wow... the level of stupid leftists will go through to try to force the global warming bs on us is crazy
I do, actually. Have a point?
Or do you mean transpiration and guttation?
Perhaps the role and action of stoma and the structures of the parenchyma?
Or are you speaking of cellular respiration?
THIS IS ABSOLUTE NONSENSE
“I do, actually. Have a point?”
Then, why did you not mention it.
There’s some there, there, but go back to times earth’s history when C02 was was order of magnitude higher and terrestrial plant growth was dense and robust.
My point was right up front: this is poppycock.
“My point was right up front: this is poppycock.”
Any discussion of plant growth omitting respiration is poppycock.
It is how plants live and grow.
I followed the science, and it led me right to George Soros and Klaus Schwab’s banks.
Decreasing CO2 result in less crops period.
I am not going to engage you.
Enjoy your day.
Ridiculous. Greenhouses and indoor farms have been pumping in CO2 for decades. Plants grow bigger and faster with high CO2.
It’s shocking that your statement even has to be said.
Plants don’t want CO2 now ,LOL
and CRAP27’s leaders are sending their minions back to their home countries to tell their governments to wind-down Oil and Gas production ,LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.