If you would like more information about what’s happening in Oregon, please FReepmail me. Please send me your name by FReepmail if you want to be on this list. It is unbelievable how crazy the left has become.
It seems like he has a case against the judge.
And this is when you tar and feather a judge. There comes a point at which they must abide by the law as written or face the consequences. There needs to be an example set.
There is only one definitive way for decent, rational Americans to act when confronted with Antifa.
Bump/Ping!
Isaiah 5:20
King James Version
20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
Appeal to a higher court.
Either that judge is fully bought in with ANTIFA or is too frightened of them to act against them.
According. To,the judge, it’s now OK to throw things at folks, threaten them and assault them apparently.
TOTALLY CORRUPT JUDGE!
My daughter and family lived in Portland for two years not long ago. It truly deserves the “Keep Portland Weird” motto. It is beautiful territory but is inhabited by complete leftist nutjobs. Driving on some of their expressways reminded me of those kinds of bridge structures and road constructions of the 60s and 70s.
Bums, strippers, leftist and homeless all over the place in downtown proper. Amidst all that, business tries to prosper but many are leaving. Then you have the nutjobs who don’t want to pay rent or buy a place and they build “Tiny” homes and find places to park them for nothing or next to nothing.
It really is the place where young people go to retire.
Block the roads. No more fascist wholesale deliveries to supermarkets.
No wonder eastern Oregon wanted to become a part of Idaho.
I’ve stated it prior among others:
In the absence judicial remedy, we need a return to street justice (tar & feather, rubber hose treatment, etc.).
Many of us may fall squarely in the ‘etc.’ category, and I’m not just referencing antifa...
I have been to Portland, OR a couple of times. It was cool and edgy. I went to Voodoo doughnuts. I went to the Veleteria. But now it has gone over the edge. It cannot be saved. The best that can come of it now is to be an example for the rest of the country. Let it burn.
If you would like more information about what’s happening in Oregon, please FReepmail me. Please send me your name by FReepmail if you want to be on this list. I think the FBI should investigate who is funding Antifa. Someone is obviously doing so.
I like Andy, but this “case” was a huge ball of air.
This is not how men should behave.
This Judge unaware that he triggered the Streisand Effect upon himself for 1) failing to carry out justice and 2) making a ridiculous screech against social media.
The problem with analyzing such articles is that many times the authors of the articles leave out important due process details imo, probably because they have never been taught the Constitution's division of federal and state government powers.
For example, if the judge was a state judge, then does Mr. Ngo understand that he might have a 14th Amendment case (...the judge...the judge...the judge...)?
"14th Amendment, Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws [emphases added]."
After all, even people in California win 14th Amendment cases.
UC Berkeley settles landmark free speech lawsuit, will pay $70,000 to conservative group (12.4.18)
Or if the judge was a federal judge, then since domestic violence is a state power concern under the Constitution's Article IV, Section 4 (4.4), then why is this case under federal jurisdiction?
"Article IV, Section 4: The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence [emphases added]."
In fact, Justice Joseph Story had noted that the delegates to the Constitutional Convention had made 4.4 to help prevent the untrusted federal government from dreaming up any excuse to stick its big nose (my words) into the affairs of the sovereign states.
”§ 1819. It may not be amiss further to observe, (in the language of another commentator,) that every pretext for intermeddling with the domestic concerns of any state, under colour of protecting it against domestic violence, is taken away by that part of the provision, which renders an application from the legislature, or executive authority of the state endangered necessary to be made to the general government, before its interference can be at all proper [emphasis added]. On the other hand, this article becomes an immense acquisition of strength, and additional force to the aid of any state government, in case of an internal rebellion, or insurrection against its authority. The southern states, being more peculiarly open to danger from this quarter, ought (he adds) to be particularly tenacious of a constitution, from which they may derive such assistance in the most critical periods.” —Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution, Article 4, Section 4.
Mr. Ngo probably needs to start reading Free Republic.