Posted on 11/16/2022 2:22:22 PM PST by The_Media_never_lie
Clay Travis said today he thought Trump should agree to support the nominee, if he(Trump) did not win the nomination.
I think that is an incredibly naive position. Does anyone think the RNC is trustworthy? Would anyone trust Mitch McConnell to be honest and fair? The only way Trump will have any leverage at all is to not to promise to support the ticket if he is not treated fairly. The GOPe Republican Establishment might joins forces with the Democrats to eliminate Trump, or clandestinely work against Trump in the primary. Why do they call it the Uniparty?
Yeah, I wouldn’t vote for a RINO or a democrat. I would have to vote for a write in.
Of course all candidates in the party’s primary should be expected to support the primary winner.
It’s the only mature option when the other party is strong and evil.
GOPe and RATS are both evil and in bed together.
Clay Travis is a republican through and through
And worse very uninformed to be hosting national radio
He’s always been Shapiroesque on Trump
Clay Travis is no Limbaugh, I don’t think he deserves the theme music. Another whiner, no insight.
The hell with the democrats and the majority of the republicons.
Let Trump trump them all with a new third party and massive steal proof support. Everyone is tired of the same old ploys. Time to take fed country down before it gets bigger bigoted.
Never heard of Clay Travis, and I see no reason to care about him.
Next...
Never heard of Clay Travis, and I see no reason to care about him.
You won’t miss a thing if you continue in that endeavor.
Clay,
President Trump does not play defense, especially 2 years out.
You are not smart enough to learn that.
A defensive position against all things socialism is not a winning position.
Open primaries are crap. They should be abolished.
Who even is he?
Well Buck and Clay ain’t Rush.
I miss Rush!
—> If there’s anything Rat’s do well its show solidarity. Oh, you think it’s 1860!
I knew democrats who liked Perot for his patriotism…
No doubt that's what some here wish for. I can be fine with it. I get a ringside seat to watch the useless republican party get laid to waste. It seems some here haven't had their fill of near one party rule, you must need a full dose. Two or three election cycles and you will be hard pressed to count ten republican senators. Have at it.
I knew Rats who liked Perot because he muddied the electoral waters! How many electoral votes did Perot win? That was 30 years ago, essentially a generation ago! Find me a genuinely patriotic Rat now!
Radically different political landscape now. We have an almost evenly divided electorate, dividing our fraction into two or more smaller fractions is not a winning strategy. The Rats know this and take it to heart. Why do you think they so quickly squashed the Bernie faction - twice!
Rats understand and practice solidarity! Rats want POWER! When the get power, they’ll argue about purity later maybe. (Usually, the biggest faction squashes the smaller!) Republicans prefer to argue about purity first hence they rarely get power!
Nope
There is absolutely no reason for you to know who that guy is, was, has been, etc., other than to know he is some guy trying his best to replace Rush. Not working...
Their show is not great, but they do brag about their numbers. Also, the I told you about this, crap. I don’t listen. I like Markley, Van Kamp and Robbins. I bet Rush would have too.....
Who are those guys? They are not Rush.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.