Posted on 11/13/2022 10:59:44 AM PST by janetjanet998
House district 3 51% in
R up 53-47
CA-9 Dem up but only 36% in
CA-13 tied 46% in
CA-21 Dem up 49% in
CA-22 Rep up 39% in
CA-27 Rep up 53% in
CA-41 Rep barely up 53% in
3 other key races with 60-75 percent in
What is going on in CA???
Link to cnn results
It’s the count down of 14 more to reach the magical 218. Republicans have been static at 211 since Wednesday.
This is looking very ominous . . .
But why are they so fall behind in the vote tallies
Even worse than AZ
Is there something that they do different?
History has shown that any Ca Lingering House races will go to the rats. Any needed ballots are ready to go
These are battleground races. Counting cannot be completed until there has been a window of at least four hours when no Republican observers are in the room. This can take many days. The rule is in the restricted access section of the Cali election manual.
I read stories indicating Los Angeles County is doing the vote dumping this weekend.
They got races the Democrat Machine wants to win for Mayor of LA and LA County Sheriff.
Orange County and inland where these races are I believed no vote counting till later.
Alaska's ranked choice system makes it much more complicated, but all signs are pointing to Peltola. 13 left. AZ District 1 looks good for dems. 2500 vote lead with 90% in, and they've voted blue since 2013. 12 left.
AZ District 6 has Engel down by 1382, but with the majority of what's left coming from blue Pima county. 11 left. Why does CA take so long? Mail in ballots - which always lean blue (especially in California). CA-3 was solidly blue in 2020, and the majority of what's left are split between Nevada and Sacramaneto counties, which both went blue in 2020. 10 left.
CA 9 is a district that leans very heavily blue. Only 36% of the votes are in, which is why it hasn't been called. But Harder is leading by 13%, and over 90% of the votes left come from very blue San Joaquin county. 9 left.
CA 13 is literally one of the bluest districts in America. They haven't voted for a republican representative, senator, governor, or president in my lifetime. While there has been some redistricting, I don't see it happening. 8 left.
Since 2012, every president, senator, governor, and congressman CA-41 elected has been blue. Redistricting brought the incumbent Calvert over from CA-42 & Calvert won in the primary with a split dem vote - BEFORE Roe. Calvert is only up by 2100, with half the vote left. 7 left.
CA 47 features one of the most watched races: Katie Porter. She's up by 5300 with 72% of the vote in, and the majority of what's left are mail-in ballots. 6 left.
CA 49 leans slightly blue. Levin is up by almost 11,000 with 75% in and the majority of what's left are mail-in votes. 5 left.
CO 8 could go either way. But currently Caraveo is up by 1691 votes, and 97% is already in. Yes, it is possible for Kirkmeyer to regain the lead, but it doesn't look good. The remaining votes would have to skew VERY differently than they've already been coming in. 4 left.
ME 2 has incumbent Golden leading by over 15K with 88% of the vote in. Many towns haven't reported AT ALL, which makes this harder to predict. Much of the votes left are in Lewiston, Bangor, and Auburn - the only three cities in the district above 10K people. 3 left.
NM 2 sees Vasquez up over the incumbent Herrell by just 1300 votes with 99% reporting. What's left? Mainly Bernalillo and Dona Ana, where Vasquez has a sizeable lead. 2 left.
OR 6 has a 4400 vote lead for Salinas with 80% in. The majoprity of what's left comes from Washington County, where Salinas leads by 24 points. Erickson will pick up significant votes in Marion and Yamhill. But it won't be enough. 1 left.
That leaves these toss-ups: CA 21, CA 22, CA 27, CA 45, CO 3, NY 22, and OR 5. If all of the previous holds and the democrats win ONE of these toss-ups, that's the ballgame. If it's Colorado 3 (Lauren Boebert's district), that would be just perfect.
So Bottom line we can stop watching this. It’s over, the rats keep the House, Senate and full control of a few states for the first time. This while the country had been turned into a dumpster fire by these same people.
Oh, l left out the rats are wrapping stealing the most important Governor’s race in the country.
From related thread...
Here is possible evidence of voting-counting fraud in California that is arguably a trigger for Section 2 of the 14th Amendment.
Woman Reports Finding Election Ballots in Ravine in the Santa Cruz Mountains (11.11.22)
Section 2 of the 14th Amendment (14A) is a penalty for states where elections have been rigged. That amendment gives the federal government the responsibility to investigate and punish offending states with a loss of House seats.
The problem now is that the corrupt feds are evidently wrongly not willing to investigate allegations of voting-related fraud imo.
Excerpted from 14A:
"Section 2: Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State." [Section 2: Apportionment of Representatives]
"Section 5: The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article."
Since the FDR era 20th Amendment (20A) arguably weakened the federal government's power for initial, 14A-based investigatons of alleged vote-counting fraud, "we" need to move the 20A requirement for seating the winners of elections from January 6 and 21 back to March 4, or wherever, to give the feds, including the courts, more time for initial investigation of now very predictable vote-counting fraud imo.
Excerpted from 20A:
"Section 1: The terms of the President and Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January, and the terms of Senators and Representatives at noon on the 3d day of January, of the years in which such terms would have ended if this article had not been ratified; and the terms of their successors shall then begin."
Note that one argument for 20A was to get rid of "lame duck" time between election day and first day of office.
But the problem with that argument is that the constitutionally limited power federal government is arguably intended to be lame duck by design, most federal domestic policy now based on stolen state powers imo.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]. [...]” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
Also, I'm sure that desperate Democrats would appreciate having more time to challenge elections that they failed to steal.
Democrats Have Objected to Electoral Vote Certification For the Last 3 GOP Presidents (1.1.21)
Insights welcome.
California needs to separate absentee voting from in person early voting. In Texas early voting and absentee voting are entirely different things. If you are able bodied and under 65, you can’t get an absentee “mail in” ballot to vote from your home county. It has to be sent outside the county and mailed back or sent back via another common carrier from a county that is not the county of residence. It’s a real pain in the posterior. I’ve only voted absentee twice.
On the other hand in Texas we have 12 days of in person early voting open to any qualified voter in the county. In my county, about 70% of the people who voted this year voted early. There were about 9 early voters per absentee voter. Early voters use exactly the same machines that are used on election day, Early voting cuts down the need for absentee voting which means fewer paper ballots to vet when they arrive at the courthouse. In person voters are vetted before ever getting a code to operate a voting booth. Their votes can be quickly and easily counted
We actually count all our early votes along with processed absentee ballots received up till that time, the weekend before the election and keep the results confidential til poll closing time on election night. The first release of results on election night are actually quite useful, because it includes data from just about all the precincts in the state. Most counties in Texas get their final vote counts done by 10:30 pm. My county got all the results finalized by 10:15 during the 10 o’clock news program.
So Bottom line we can stop watching this.
——
Not sure about that but the past few days everyone was focused on the senate and NV and AZ
NBC “projected” 222 a few days ago now only 219
I only hear talk about who’s going to be speaker
And not if we can actually hold the house
Which may come down to these CA races
Looks promising except I recall in the 2018 House election, of the 11 districts where Republicans had the earlier lead, after weeks of counting the Democrat/Communists won 10 of the 11.
I was at first disappointed that the race in District 3 wasn't called (it's an open seat) and today stands at slightly over half the ballots have been counted, but maybe -- just maybe -- in this historically conservative area of California (Tom McClintock was my rep until the recent redistricting), Placer County (the most populous in the district) is slow-counting to thwart the harvesting efforts of the Democrat/Communists who are streaming into the county from the hell-hole of the San Francisco Bay Area.
We better hope Kiley prevails because his opponent has promised to stay the course of FJB's policies. Sounds to me that if Jones were to win, he would be just another of Pelosi's "House boys". (A "racist" term? Nah ... not really as bad a term as it could be......) [Can you tell I'm a little PO'd on a Sunday?!]
As of this afternoon, this is where things stand on the undecided House races in California: District 3- Kiley(R) 53.0; Jones(D) 47.0 (53% counted)
District 9- Patti(R) 43.7; Harder(D-Inc) 56.3 (47% counted)
District 13- Gray(D) 49.9; Duarte(R) 50.1 (61% counted)
District 21- Costa(D-Inc) 54.6; Maher(R) 45.4 (75% counted)
District 22- Salas(D) 47.5; Valadao(R-Inc) 52.5 (53% counted)
District 27- Smith(D) 44.6; Garcia(R-Inc) 55.4 (67% counted)
District 34- Gomez(D) 53.0; Kim(D) 47.0 (68% counted)
District 41- Rollins(D) 49.3; Calvert(R-Inc) 50.7 (67% counted)
District 45- Chen(D) 46.3; Steel(R-Inc) 53.7 (70% counted)
District 47- Porter(D-Inc) 51.3; Baugh(D) 48.7 (72% counted)
District 49- Levin(D-Inc) 52.4; Mayott(R) 47.6 (71% counted)
It’s absurd and Ipsy facto is evidence if not proof of shenanigans.
Computerized voting, early voting, drop off voting etc…All the changes that have been made should make results faster to obtain, not slower.
“ History has shown that any Ca Lingering House races will go to the rats. Any needed ballots are ready to go”
The Al Franken “win” was the one that I first noticed as obvious fraud.
Michigan every four years I noticed would be for the Republican until Detroit reported always last and provided enough votes for the Dem to win.
I would think that it was demographics, which it is large part, but it’s more than that.
The elections systems in this country are totally trashed. Drastic, serious solutions are needed right away, otherwise, forget about the United States of America. It’s over.
-PJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.