How to force local hand counts on election night: WRITE IN ALL CANDIDATES!

Vanity | November 1, 2022 | Dr. Franklin

[Dr. Franklin]

From the Big Steal of the 2020 Election, it is apparent that machines, and software were used to rig the election, which was followed by various and sundry legal fig leafs, such as laches and standing, to deprive aggrieved candidates and voters of the evidence needed, i.e., the ballots, to prove the election was fraudulent. This worked because the election workers who traditionally tabulated the votes on election night were bypassed by the machines and software and couldn't give witness to much in court.

So how do we frustrate this scheme? We return the power of the local election workers to count the actual ballots by 1) voting in person, not by mail-in or drop off ballots which get tabulated, or even switched out, in corrupted central locations, and 2) writing in all candidates, even when they are already on the ballot. In this way, the local election officials will get to count the ballots, and witness the number of people doing so, which creates its own evidence and paper trails if needed for court cases later. It will also serve notice on the corrupt politicians getting kick backs or guaranteed election victories from the corrupt election machine industry that stolen elections like 2020 have no legitimacy and to stop giving multi-million dollar contracts for cheating machines. It's much harder to fake millions of write-in ballots and the hand writing can't be the same on hundreds of ballots in each precinct.

So that's the best solution: write in all candidates, even if they are already on the ballot. Tell your friends and neighbors this is how we stop the cheating. If you keep doing the same thing as 2020 and expect a different result in 2022, you are acting crazy. We need a different approach in 2022.

[The Old Hoosier]

Don’t do this unless you want your vote not to count.

[Sacajaweau]

i’m afraid circular file would fill quickly.

[Bob434]

BUT how will you know they count your vote? (I guess any way we vote we can’t be sure)

[bigbob]

Nobody should do this. Dumb!

[Dr. Franklin]

BUT how will you know they count your vote? (I guess any way we vote we can’t be sure)

It's all about who you trust more to count your vote accurately and fairly, the people in you local voting precinct, or the machines and central authority running the election. To quote Stalin:
"I regard it as completely unimportant who in the party will vote and how, but it is extremely important who will count the votes and how."

[zeestephen]

Absurd idea in Seattle.

Write in votes are only counted if the total number of write in ballots is larger than the vote difference between two candidates.

My county votes 70%-80% Democrat on most issues.

Write in ballots almost never reach the vote threshold to be counted.

[Warriorposter]

Follow this advice and your vote will NOT be counted.

[Dr. Franklin]

My county votes 70%-80% Democrat on most issues.

And you know this how? Because Dominion reports that?

[rgboomers]

Locally, some years back, a candidate for sheriff ran a write-in campaign. He was the only challenger. The result? The incumbent won with 100% of the vote. All write in ballots were thrown out. Do not think this can not happen!

[Steven W.]

Sorry but that just ensures your ballot is put into the pool that is used for shifting the counts.

[real saxophonist]

If you skip over Lauren Boebert at the top of the ballot, and then write in Lauren Boebert, that will not be counted as a vote for Lauren Boebert.

[Tupelo]

The Cochise County, Arizona Board of Supervisors voted last week to hand count all the ballots even with the computer count. They are as skeptical as the rest of us.
The only problem is population of Cochise County would not make a pimple on Arizona’s arse.
But they are trying.

[SACK UP]

Bad idea.

[Dr. Franklin]

Locally, some years back, a candidate for sheriff ran a write-in campaign. He was the only challenger. The result? The incumbent won with 100% of the vote. All write in ballots were thrown out. Do not think this can not happen!

You forgot that Lisa Murkowski won reelection in 2010 as a write-in candidate after losing the Republican nomination in Alaska for reelection. It's much easier to got to court to get write in ballots counted than to question the decree of Dominion. It creates a paper trail.

[discostu]

Oh there’s a great plan, force the count to be done more slowly and less accurately. Brilliant!

[mewzilla]

Wanna know how?

See my tagline.

[Dr. Franklin]

If you skip over Lauren Boebert at the top of the ballot, and then write in Lauren Boebert, that will not be counted as a vote for Lauren Boebert.

So judges ruled in 2020 that ballots needed to be counted when the dates were wrong, but write-ins can't count? I've seen a judge do exactly that, ordering write-in votes to be counted in a close election. It's much easier to do that than prove that ballots were destroyed and switched out as happened in 2020 in the week it took to declare Biden the winner.

[joe fonebone]

You don’t have to write them all in.
Just write in one.

[real saxophonist]

If one writes in a candidate that is actually on the ballot, that whole ballot will probably be thrown out, no matter what any law says. That’s unfortunate, and I don’t necessarily disagree with your premise, but that’s what will happen.