Posted on 10/30/2022 7:34:39 PM PDT by NeverCheney
“We’re not going to win votes by shouting that some Democrat bigwig swings both ways (something that I suspect is a bipartisan proclivity in DC).. But voters do care about crime”
Wrong. The democrats/communists don’t give 2 winks about anyone crying about the crime in SF. It’s been going on for decades now. They continue to lie, and continue to re-elect Pelosi (fraud). They do care about the Speaker’s connection to a fag/homosexual/male prostitute angle because quite a few lowlifes on both sides of the aisle have had to resign because of a sex scandal gone wild.
That besides Republicans touching their toes to accept the “Official Narrative” with any real facts known about this.
Some noob that comes in here trying to put blinders on us, hiding what is happening in real life, just to focus on 1 thing (while ignoring everything else), doesn’t seem like a good idea.
Most Pubby Pols are moron go along to get along fake second place holders in place....and they are happy to be there.
Excellent response!
From the main article: Stop talking about Mr Pelosi’s underwear and politicians’ rhetoric. The GOP talking point should be that SF crime is out of control, including break-ins
The average low-info voter in SF will be more moved (to vote in the proper fashion) by skewering the ridiculous, disgusting behavior of Mr. Pelosi than by a general discussion of the vagaries of street crime.
Regards,
The problem is that, by agreeing to a calm debate about crime, you implicitly exonerate the Dems of their past atrocious behavior and also legitimize their standing in such a discussion.
This is like the hapless wife coming home to find her husband naked in bed with another woman, and the husband then insisting that they calmly discuss "whether a BJ actually constitutes sex" or "what the definition of 'is' is."
We should play to our strengths, or at least not ignore their weaknesses!
Regards,
They can chew gum and walk at the same time
Then we should frame the discourse thusly:
"We Conservatives are tough on crime! We don't care whether it was a drunken gay orgy gone bad, like with Pelosi - Hey, can you imagine those two pervs, just standing there in their soiled underwear, swinging hammers at each other! Hah! - or if it was a mugging in Golden Gate Park: We want the tougher enforcement of existing laws!"
Regards,
No - But this story might just weaken Nanzi Pelosi's standing in Congress and/or political power, if we exploit it properly!
Regards,
How hard would it have been to spike Nancy’s ice cream with some fentanyl?
Ummm...you have no “cred” here....
NeverCheney
Since Aug 13, 2022
Welcome to FR.
Um, did your liberal handlers tell you to deflect like that?
I had to go back and look at photos of Paul Pelosi, and he does have that toothy ghey grin
Agree. This afternoon nearly EVERY post was about Pelosi’s husband...
I think this is being used as some sort of distraction—like the brandon grope...
IMHO, we have bigger fish to fry.
The point is that ALL democrats are perverts. That is why crime is out of control where they are in charge.
Repeat: Democrats are all, everyone of them, perverts. That is why crime is out of control where they are in charge
We can walk and chew gum at the same time.
The corrupt press ran with a story about Paul’s lover/whore being a conservative - from thin air and lies. We have the right to attack back. We should class action sue the press.
We can also mock the double standards of the FBI (had the guy really been a conservative the FBI would have leaked that to the Washington Post before dawn that morning...)
AND after all that, we’d still had time to point out liberal elites caused crime rates to skyrocket because of their stupid ideas on bail... and defunding police. Yes, we can do it all.
Right on, brother from another mother!
What is of real importance is Nanzi’s next move. It will be discovered that the hammer blow that Paul received has:
1) effected his memory, he cannot recall the events
2) he has no recollection of dave.
3) he does not know Nanzi
4) he has incipient memory problems
5) he cannot remember his name or address
6) his long-term prognosis is not good
7) doctors insist that for his own safety Paul needs to remain in their care
8) Paul will not be giving interviews as doctors fear the process might traumatize him and futher impede recovery
9) this is an open-ended process and everything that can be done to help Paul recover will be consider. Discuussions of pre-frontal lobotomy are premature but certainly not off the table
10) NIMH assistance is welcomed
Democrats really can’t do anything right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.