Replies

nothing to see, young healthy kids die every day for no reason

lately!!!

SUDS

He didn't sprain his ankle, catch an elbow to the jaw, skin his knee, break his arm, etc. He died.

Yet, there are still those who deny that the Jim Jones Jab is deadly. Whether criminal or psychotic Branch Covidians, they all need to face charges.

A few weeks ago, someone challenged the assertion that there are more sudden youth deaths nowadays vs prior to the mRNA shots under EUA being administered. The skeptic said that all we are seeing is a contemporary cheery-picking of "died suddenly" stories by antivaxxers with no investigation into what was the actual historical quantim of sudden-deaths.

Here is a data-driven response:

A study Sudden Deaths in Young Competitive Athletes-Analysis of 1866 Deaths in the United States, 1980–2006 shows an average of sixty-six (66) deaths per year.

A separate global study, Sudden cardiac death in athletes: the Lausanne Recommendations lists 1101 (1966-2004) reported cases in athletes under 35 years, or an average of 29 per year.

This data set of citizen reports shows 718 (and counting) of such deaths in 2022.

Now, these data are apples and oranges. The peer data averages may be downed-biased because the researchers didn't have Internet search capabilities back then. Also the first study is US only and the Lausanne study is global. Finally, the citizen dataset is not totally homogenous with that of the peer data, most notably on an age basis.

Thus, let's fix what we can - the age difference.

Let's take the citizen dataset, and focus on people 13-25 (the age range with the first study). Through October 15, 2022, I count seven such deaths, Sept 2022-17 , Aug 2022-about 30, July 2022-15, June 2022-22, May 2022-19, April 2022-22, March 2022-44 (that was a tough month), February 2022-17, January 2022-31.

Grand total through Oct 15, 2022 is 224.

If I annualized these 224 deaths through 287 days, I'd get 285 deaths. That's waaaaaay more than the benchmarks. Notwithsndingnthe pros and cons to the data sets, this result should be, for people of good faith, worthy of a "hmmmmm...." and further investigation. Something is up.

Now, let's be honest: these citizen datasets suffer from a lack of consistency in data capture, recording, and processing that the benchmark data possess (though they, as noted, the benchmarks likely suffer from a reporting limitation). It's the same reason why clinical trials are so important in assessing whether or not a shot should graduate to a vaccine. Thus, nobody should do a victory lap with 224 or 287. Indeed, we are taking about young people dying - nobody should be happy.

I am also not going to claim that all of this data are prima facie evidence that the shots are causing these sudden deaths. In fact, I am hoping that the claim that zillions of shot-recipients will be dead in five years turns out to be as wrong as it is sensational.

However, considering the virtual absence of legitimate data capture with consistent recording, data scrubbing, and verification, we drink the dirty water at the oasis in this desert.

The data are compelling - SOMETHING bad is happening to youths.

Let's keep in mind, these shots were granted EUA and weren't subject to proper clinical trials, to assess long-term risks. This is especially worrying because vaccines fail trials 59% of the time and take a median of 9 years.

Thus, we should have little tolerance for bad side effects.