Posted on 10/19/2022 11:29:41 AM PDT by Qiviut
Nearly every day there is a report of a young, fit individual, usually a man, who suffers unexplained sudden death now termed “sudden adult death syndrome.” Because COVID-19 vaccination is highly prevalent and linked to the development of heart inflammation and myocarditis, it is a conservative and reasonable conclusion that unless otherwise ruled out, sudden adult death syndrome is a consequence of myocarditis. The differential diagnosis could include other vaccine related serious adverse events including fatal pulmonary embolism, multisystem inflammatory disorder, and vaccine induced thrombocytopenic purpura. Unlike sudden death, most of the other conditions give patients and doctors a chance at making a diagnosis, hospitalization, and treatment. Because half or more of COVID-19 vaccine induced myocarditis is asymptomatic,[i] the first manifestation can be collapse due to an abnormal heart rhythm and unless promptly resuscitated, the pathway to death is rapid and final.
With > 200 peer-reviewed manuscripts on the topic, there are some emerging patterns: 1) deaths do not occur randomly across vaccine manufacturing lots but rather tend to occur in “hot lots”[ii] that may be a proxy for more viable mRNA or adenoviral DNA delivery and greater Spike protein deposition in the heart, 2) genetic predisposition has been reported by Ittiwut et al (SCN5A mutation),[iii] and almost certainly more risk alleles will be discovered, 3) acute presentations within 30 days of the first and second injections if detected are usually hospitalized and undergo testing with cardiac MRI being conclusive, 4) if diagnosed there is an opportunity for rest, therapy, and risk stratification for implantation of a defibrillator.
For those of you who know someone in your circles who has died unexpectedly since the advent of COVID-19 vaccination, encourage the surviving family members to reassure the world publicly if they were unvaccinated. If families, school, and employers remain shamefully silent, assume the cause of death is attributable to the vaccine. This is a safe and reasonable inference since COVID-19 vaccine induced myocarditis is a proven cause of death in the peer-reviewed scientific literature.[iv] [v] Fatal myocarditis should be sobering for those who encouraged and pressured victims into vaccination including doctors, family, school, employers, military, and others. They should reflect upon their actions that resulted in the loss of life, and carry on in self-reproach, seeking forgiveness. On a practical basis, life insurance companies will need to rely upon a working diagnosis and cause of death to re-calculate actuarial risk groups and post-vaccine premium rates. Finally, for the rest to remain alive without heart damage or risk of sudden adult death syndrome, the current products must be recognized as a public health threat, recalled from global markets, and discarded—all of them.
[i] Mansanguan S, Charunwatthana P, Piyaphanee W, Dechkhajorn W, Poolcharoen A, Mansanguan C. Cardiovascular Manifestation of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in Adolescents. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 19;7(8):196. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed7080196. PMID: 36006288; PMCID: PMC9414075.
[ii] Latypova S. “Hot Lots” of Covid-19 Vaccines - Evidence of Different Formulations? TrialSite News, Jul. 16, 2022
[iii] Ittiwut C, Mahasirimongkol S, Srisont S, Ittiwut R, Chockjamsai M, Durongkadech P, Sawaengdee W, Khunphon A, Larpadisorn K, Wattanapokayakit S, Wetchaphanphesat S, Arunotong S, Srimahachota S, Pittayawonganon C, Thammawijaya P, Sutdan D, Doungngern P, Khongphatthanayothin A, Kerr SJ, Shotelersuk V. Genetic basis of sudden death after COVID-19 vaccination in Thailand. Heart Rhythm. 2022 Aug 5:S1547-5271(22)02266-4. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.07.019. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35934244; PMCID: PMC9352648.
[iv] Choi S, Lee S, Seo JW, Kim MJ, Jeon YH, Park JH, Lee JK, Yeo NS. Myocarditis-induced Sudden Death after BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination in Korea: Case Report Focusing on Histopathological Findings. J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Oct 18;36(40):e286. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e286. PMID: 34664804; PMCID: PMC8524235.
[v] Gill JR, Tashjian R, Duncanson E. Autopsy Histopathologic Cardiac Findings in 2 Adolescents Following the Second COVID-19 Vaccine Dose. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2022 Aug 1;146(8):925-929. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0435-SA. PMID: 35157759.
I will check out both of them, thanks.
SecAmndmt wrote: “If they’re identical and interchangeable, why are they only giving the original and not Cominarty?”
Why does that matter since they are the same thing.
SecAmndmt wrote: “Why did they extend the EUA on PF/BION and not Cominarty? Why did they approve Cominarty, which is not available, and not approve PF/BION, which is available.”
The only difference is the label. One says Cominarty, one says PF/BION. Why does this matter to you?
SecAmndmt wrote: “The FDA press release says that they are legally distinct. What does that mean, and why does it matter?”
It also says the distinction do not affect safety or effectiveness.
https://www.nebraskamed.com/COVID/you-asked-we-answered-are-pfizers-comirnaty-and-biontech-covid-19-vaccines-the-same-or-different
The FDA is making a distinction between the two; clearly, they're not the same thing.
As your response is to simply repeat that they are, your argument has clearly reached its limit.
(Tell us what the FDA sees that you don't and then get back to us.)
Captain Walker wrote: “The FDA is making a distinction between the two; clearly, they’re not the same thing.”
The great philosopher of the 20th Century, “Deep Throad” made this profound statement: (IIRC). “If you want to understand, follow the money.”
This article explains the distinction:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4102403/posts
Show me the CDC or FDA link where it says the vaccines have been fully tested and are approved under something other than the emergency use authorization. States are telling the CDC to shove it with the covid vaccine requirement for children. Many are stating it’s because the vaccine is not fully approved. Are that many officials high up in state departments ignorant? Or maybe it’s just you
Many simply do not wish to get the vaccine. One of their favorite arguments is that the vaccines are not fully approved but they are:
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-covid-19-vaccine
Oh yes, the Comirnaty one. But it’s not available in the US.
So why did Pfizer come out with this vaccine but not to give it to people? Some military members thought they were getting this, but instead got one approved only under the EUA.
Along with being fully approved, Pfizer also has full liability.
It doesn’t look like anyone is being fully honest.
CottonBall wrote: “So why did Pfizer come out with this vaccine but not to give it to people? Some military members thought they were getting this, but instead got one approved only under the EUA.”
Comirnaty is available, it’s just not being administered. Why would anyone take comirnaty at $110 per shot when the Pfizer/BioNTech is free? Once the Pfizer/BioNTech is exhausted, Comirnaty will be used.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4102403/posts
CottonBall wrote: “Along with being fully approved, Pfizer also has full liability.”
Where did you hear that? All makers of vaccines are protected from liability by the PERP Act except for matters of negligence. Show me otherwise.
“Comirnaty is available, it’s just not being administered. Why would anyone take comirnaty at $110 per shot when the Pfizer/BioNTech is free?”
Available but not being administered. That’s some word jingling to cover up Pfizer’s intentions. As in, no intention of letting anyone have it.
“Where did you hear that? All makers of vaccines are protected from liability by the PERP Act except for matters of negligence.”
Just search with a non-biased search engine for “Comirnaty liability”. Lots of links.
https://www.theburningplatform.com/2021/11/05/heres-the-real-reason-comirnaty-is-not-available/
“The reason Comirnaty isn’t available is because those shots would expose the company to liability since the fully-licensed product doesn’t have the liability waiver of the EUA product.”
Most of the other links say the same thing.
You’ve been here since 1999. Yet for all of 2022, you’ve posted about nothing but the vaccines.
Have you turned liberal?
Being paid by Big Pharma?
Work for Big Pharma?
You and/or loved ones took the jab and are now trying to rationalize that it’ll be ok.
Only the latter is justifiable.
CottonBall wrote: “You’ve been here since 1999. Yet for all of 2022, you’ve posted about nothing but the vaccines.”
Nothing like personal attacks to prove your desperation.
Sorry, didn’t mean it as an attack but a question.
People who want to get others maimed or killed must have a reason.
That wasn’t meant as a personal attack either. And I have no desperation, I haven’t taken the jab so I have nothing to worry about. Other than liberals destroying the country in a plethora of ways. But to stay here, voicing opjjnions nobody wants to hear - that’s an odd chouce of hobby. And may i say, smacks of desperation because you won’t have an impact. Not here.
CottonBall wrote: “People who want to get others maimed or killed must have a reason.”
You mean like the anti-vaxxers spreading misinformation in an attempt to discourage vaccination?
CottonBall wrote: “But to stay here, voicing opjjnions nobody wants to hear.”
Perhaps it’s time to listen to opinions that you don’t want to hear.
BTW, I haven’t seen your response to my information about why Pfizer hasn’t marketed Comirnaty. Nor have I seen your response about why you thought pfizer would lose their liability protection after full approval.
This post discusses the liability
What do you think about the border?
Student loan forgiveness?
Packing the Supremes?
Wading into a thread populated by FRoctors I see.
Let’s hope we all learn something from our FRoctors, our betters.
CottonBall wrote: “What do you think about the border? Student loan forgiveness? Packing the Supremes? “
Close the border. No loan forgiveness. No court packing.
Now what do you think the $130 price tag for comirnaty has anything to do with it’s not being on the market?
The other vaccines are just as much, but either taxpayers are fitting the bill for insurance companies are forced to cover it with no copay.
Comirnaty should be an option though. It’s the only one that is approved. Some people might be willing to pay it. Saying that they have a vaccine that is approved but you can’t have it makes no sense. If something is fully tested and we can see the results of the test and the details of the studies, there’s no reason not to make it available.
I hit send too soon. Oh and thanks for the other answers. I was just wondering what your political mindset was.
Why would the government pay for non-approved vaccines but not cover the one that is? That really makes no sense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.