Posted on 10/19/2022 11:29:41 AM PDT by Qiviut
Nearly every day there is a report of a young, fit individual, usually a man, who suffers unexplained sudden death now termed “sudden adult death syndrome.” Because COVID-19 vaccination is highly prevalent and linked to the development of heart inflammation and myocarditis, it is a conservative and reasonable conclusion that unless otherwise ruled out, sudden adult death syndrome is a consequence of myocarditis. The differential diagnosis could include other vaccine related serious adverse events including fatal pulmonary embolism, multisystem inflammatory disorder, and vaccine induced thrombocytopenic purpura. Unlike sudden death, most of the other conditions give patients and doctors a chance at making a diagnosis, hospitalization, and treatment. Because half or more of COVID-19 vaccine induced myocarditis is asymptomatic,[i] the first manifestation can be collapse due to an abnormal heart rhythm and unless promptly resuscitated, the pathway to death is rapid and final.
With > 200 peer-reviewed manuscripts on the topic, there are some emerging patterns: 1) deaths do not occur randomly across vaccine manufacturing lots but rather tend to occur in “hot lots”[ii] that may be a proxy for more viable mRNA or adenoviral DNA delivery and greater Spike protein deposition in the heart, 2) genetic predisposition has been reported by Ittiwut et al (SCN5A mutation),[iii] and almost certainly more risk alleles will be discovered, 3) acute presentations within 30 days of the first and second injections if detected are usually hospitalized and undergo testing with cardiac MRI being conclusive, 4) if diagnosed there is an opportunity for rest, therapy, and risk stratification for implantation of a defibrillator.
For those of you who know someone in your circles who has died unexpectedly since the advent of COVID-19 vaccination, encourage the surviving family members to reassure the world publicly if they were unvaccinated. If families, school, and employers remain shamefully silent, assume the cause of death is attributable to the vaccine. This is a safe and reasonable inference since COVID-19 vaccine induced myocarditis is a proven cause of death in the peer-reviewed scientific literature.[iv] [v] Fatal myocarditis should be sobering for those who encouraged and pressured victims into vaccination including doctors, family, school, employers, military, and others. They should reflect upon their actions that resulted in the loss of life, and carry on in self-reproach, seeking forgiveness. On a practical basis, life insurance companies will need to rely upon a working diagnosis and cause of death to re-calculate actuarial risk groups and post-vaccine premium rates. Finally, for the rest to remain alive without heart damage or risk of sudden adult death syndrome, the current products must be recognized as a public health threat, recalled from global markets, and discarded—all of them.
[i] Mansanguan S, Charunwatthana P, Piyaphanee W, Dechkhajorn W, Poolcharoen A, Mansanguan C. Cardiovascular Manifestation of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in Adolescents. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 19;7(8):196. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed7080196. PMID: 36006288; PMCID: PMC9414075.
[ii] Latypova S. “Hot Lots” of Covid-19 Vaccines - Evidence of Different Formulations? TrialSite News, Jul. 16, 2022
[iii] Ittiwut C, Mahasirimongkol S, Srisont S, Ittiwut R, Chockjamsai M, Durongkadech P, Sawaengdee W, Khunphon A, Larpadisorn K, Wattanapokayakit S, Wetchaphanphesat S, Arunotong S, Srimahachota S, Pittayawonganon C, Thammawijaya P, Sutdan D, Doungngern P, Khongphatthanayothin A, Kerr SJ, Shotelersuk V. Genetic basis of sudden death after COVID-19 vaccination in Thailand. Heart Rhythm. 2022 Aug 5:S1547-5271(22)02266-4. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.07.019. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35934244; PMCID: PMC9352648.
[iv] Choi S, Lee S, Seo JW, Kim MJ, Jeon YH, Park JH, Lee JK, Yeo NS. Myocarditis-induced Sudden Death after BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination in Korea: Case Report Focusing on Histopathological Findings. J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Oct 18;36(40):e286. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e286. PMID: 34664804; PMCID: PMC8524235.
[v] Gill JR, Tashjian R, Duncanson E. Autopsy Histopathologic Cardiac Findings in 2 Adolescents Following the Second COVID-19 Vaccine Dose. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2022 Aug 1;146(8):925-929. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0435-SA. PMID: 35157759.
PING
Nonsense.
The very fact that big pharma used to do extended testing and long term, like years worth of testing, to verify that a drug or medical treatment was safe, shows that your claim is a lie.
One does not put a new drug on the market and demand that everyone assume it’s safe until proved otherwise.
That is not how scientific research is done.
Trust must be earned. It is not an inherent right that anyone is owed.
So where is the long term test results that have been standard procedure for decades to prove that the Covid vaxes are “safe”?
metmom wrote: “The very fact that big pharma used to do extended testing and long term, like years worth of testing, to verify that a drug or medical treatment was safe, shows that your claim is a lie.”
Since the vaccines have saved over a million lives in the US alone is evidence of the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines. Those live would have been lost had we spent years performing the years of testing that you preferred.
I'm taking this point back. (I don't know if you know these details and are participating in the sham or if you simply don't know.)
The FDA approval applies only to Comirnaty, which is not available on the US market.
The Pfizer and Moderna products on the market now are under EUA, which is why the manufacturers cannot be sued.
Did you read the article? Or the many others like it? If that is not “proof” then prove to me that the earth is round.
“With > 200 peer-reviewed manuscripts on the topic, there are some emerging patterns:”
Ok. I guess patterns aren’t proof? What would you define as proof. 200 peer reviewed manuscripts aren’t enough? I’m thinking nothing would be enough for you.
Captain Walker wrote: “The FDA approval applies only to Comirnaty, which is not available on the US market.”
That’s incorrect. Comirnaty and the vaccine previously known as “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine” are identical and interchangeable.
What is Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty?
Once vaccines are approved by the FDA, companies can market the vaccines under brand names. COMIRNATY is the brand name for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. After FDA
approval, the FDA-authorized Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine for individuals ages 12 years and older can now be marketed as COMIRNATY. No change was made to the vaccine’s formula with the name change.
Captain Walker wrote: “The Pfizer and Moderna products on the market now are under EUA, which is why the manufacturers cannot be sued.”
There is no difference in the legal liabilities.
I hope both of them are watching their backs. You never know if they are targeted for, well, use your imagination.
saleman wrote: “Ok. I guess patterns aren’t proof? What would you define as proof. 200 peer reviewed manuscripts aren’t enough? I’m thinking nothing would be enough for you.”
No patterns are not proof but are cause for further investigation. Generally speaking, Myocarditis is more likely to be caused by the virus and by the vaccine.
In terms of their composition, perhaps. But in terms of legal liability, they're as different as night and day. The FDA will not allow the Comirnaty label to be placed on the existing stockpiles of drugs; the only Covid shots available in the US are available under the EUA.
Pfizer and Moderna would both lose their legal protection if their shots were not authorized under the EUA.
(In your response, please explain how neither Pfizer nor Moderna can be sued if they are using FDA fully approved drugs.)
I hope both of them are watching their backs. You never know if they are targeted for, well, use your imagination.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I would imagine they’re being cautious ... some of the other docs (Malone, for instance) are paying attention to security.
Karen Kingston was targeted and almost killed - definitely an assassination attempt. Brooke Jackson (whistleblower), after she realized the danger she was in, dropped out of sight for a good while - she’s back now with a lawsuit & I’m guessing good security. When “billions” are at stake, human lives don’t matter .... that’s obvious from what is going on with the “vax”.
PS:
If you don’t know Karen Kingston, she “is a biotech analyst with over 20 years of experience. She’s a contributor to discussion forums and news media with US and global doctors, scientists, and attorneys on the biological effects of the COVID-19 gene editing injections: . Here’s her substack:
https://karenkingston.substack.com/
Brook Jackson is a whistleblower and clinical trial expert who spent time overseeing the Pfizer COVID-19 “Vaccine” trials in Texas, where the things she witnessed were beyond shocking.
After months of being silenced through legal intimidation, Brook has now filed a lawsuit against Big Pharma, and joins us today to tell you what the Mainstream Media and Big Pharma won’t.
Interview with Brooke:
https://zeeemedia.com/interview/brook-jackson-pfizer-whistleblower-exposes-undeniable-pharma-fraud-sues-pfizer/
Captain Walker wrote: “In terms of their composition, perhaps. But in terms of legal liability, they’re as different as night and day. The FDA will not allow the Comirnaty label to be placed on the existing stockpiles of drugs; the only Covid shots available in the US are available under the EUA.”
Captain Walker wrote: “Pfizer and Moderna would both lose their legal protection if their shots were not authorized under the EUA.”
Even Malone admits that this is incorrect:
https://www.factcheck.org/2021/08/scicheck-researcher-distorts-facts-on-covid-19-vaccine-approval-liability/
Captain Walker wrote: “(In your response, please explain how neither Pfizer nor Moderna can be sued if they are using FDA fully approved drugs.)”
It’s called the PERP act.
"The letter noted that, although Comirnaty is approved, “there is not sufficient approved vaccine available for distribution to this population in its entirety at the time of reissuance of this EUA."
The fully-approved product is not available in the US.
Captain Walker wrote: “The fully-approved product is not available in the US.”
What part of identical and interchangeable do you not understand?
What difference does the name on the label make? Would it make you feel better if the pharmacist took a magic marker and marked through the Pfizer name and wrote in Comirnaty? It’s still the same identical and interchangeable product.
When you make the inconsiquential arguments such as these that tells people that you’re just looking for an excuse, not matter how flimsy, to avoid the vaccines. That’s why you’re an anti-vaxxer.
Then why doesn't the FDA simply give its full approval to the existing stockpiles?
(Why do you have a problem with an individual following the FDA's distinction between the two products?)
Captain Walker wrote: “Then why doesn’t the FDA simply give its full approval to the existing stockpiles?”
They have.
Captain Walker wrote: “(Why do you have a problem with an individual following the FDA’s distinction between the two products?)”
Why do you have a problem with identical and interchageable?
Ciao.
Captain Walker wrote: “We’ve made a complete circle, and you haven’t demonstrated your point.”
only because you refuse to recognize that Comarnity and Pfizer/Biotech are identical and interchangeable. But, of course, you have no choice except to reject those facts since accepting them completely undermines your arguments.
You’re “fact checking” again? lol.
I’m a bit surprised that FR allows you to stick around, given that you spout Enemy talking points.
If they’re identical and interchangeable, why are they only giving the original and not Cominarty? Why did they extend the EUA on PF/BION and not Cominarty? Why did they approve Cominarty, which is not available, and not approve PF/BION, which is available. The FDA press release says that they are legally distinct. What does that mean, and why does it matter?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.