If they’re identical and interchangeable, why are they only giving the original and not Cominarty? Why did they extend the EUA on PF/BION and not Cominarty? Why did they approve Cominarty, which is not available, and not approve PF/BION, which is available. The FDA press release says that they are legally distinct. What does that mean, and why does it matter?
SecAmndmt wrote: “If they’re identical and interchangeable, why are they only giving the original and not Cominarty?”
Why does that matter since they are the same thing.
SecAmndmt wrote: “Why did they extend the EUA on PF/BION and not Cominarty? Why did they approve Cominarty, which is not available, and not approve PF/BION, which is available.”
The only difference is the label. One says Cominarty, one says PF/BION. Why does this matter to you?
SecAmndmt wrote: “The FDA press release says that they are legally distinct. What does that mean, and why does it matter?”
It also says the distinction do not affect safety or effectiveness.
https://www.nebraskamed.com/COVID/you-asked-we-answered-are-pfizers-comirnaty-and-biontech-covid-19-vaccines-the-same-or-different