To: for-q-clinton
Cheating in a sporting contest is a bit different from robbing a bank.
6 posted on
10/13/2022 5:18:27 AM PDT by
Flick Lives
(Cui bono)
To: Flick Lives
I guess we’ll be needing a lot of paddy wagons at football games.
To: Flick Lives
its a bit more than just a sporting contest. They were competing for and cheating to win cash prizes. They took in hundreds of thousands of dollars over the last few years. What they did fits the definition of fraud. They can and should be prosecuted for it.
13 posted on
10/13/2022 5:25:04 AM PDT by
FLT-bird
To: Flick Lives
Black Sox didn’t rob a bank.
And yes it is different. It’s more like stealing a car.
15 posted on
10/13/2022 5:30:02 AM PDT by
for-q-clinton
(Cancel Culture IS fascism...Let's start calling it that!)
To: Flick Lives
Yeah... there’s a lot more money in the fishing tournaments.
31 posted on
10/13/2022 5:47:53 AM PDT by
gundog
( It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen. )
To: Flick Lives
Except the sporting contest in question pays a whole lot more than the average bank robbery. This competition paid $30,000. The average bank robbery is $2,000
33 posted on
10/13/2022 5:55:28 AM PDT by
cyclotic
(Follow 1776rm.com. Fighting for our Constitution. @1776RM on Truth)
To: Flick Lives
correct...they can take the money back...or the guys house. walleye...best fish ever...from canadian waters...
To: Flick Lives
Cheating in a sporting contest is a bit different from robbing a bank.
Tell that to the guy who took second place and missed out on bringing home prizes from 10k to 30k.
To: Flick Lives
How so? Not all bank robberies are armed robberies.
Are you okay with embezzlement?
62 posted on
10/13/2022 12:26:24 PM PDT by
dirtymac
( Now Is The Time For All Good Men To ComeTo The Aid Of Their Country! NOW) )
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson