Posted on 10/07/2022 9:09:35 PM PDT by lowbridge
Democratic Rep. Sean Casten's 17-year-old daughter Gwen passed away earlier this year due to sudden cardiac arrythmia, the family noted in a statement.
"In layman's terms, she was fine, and then her heart stopped," the statement explained, noting that the young woman was healthy and that the family does not know the reason the heart issue occurred.
"Gwen was a healthy 2022 teenager. She ate well, exercised, got regular check-ups, didn't suffer from any behavioral health issues, and had close relationships with family and friends. She was fully vaccinated, and quarantined after occasional positive, asymptomatic COVID tests during the omicron wave. She had just come home from an evening with friends, went to bed and didn't wake up," the family noted.
"We are heartbroken, but we are not unique. Sudden, unexplained heart-failure among young, healthy people is rare but real. We are left grasping at the wrong end of random chance," the statement read. "None of us know when our last heartbeat will come. The best we can hope for is that when our loved ones do pass, we will have no regrets about the time we were lucky enough to share."
(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...
Saving, to reread.
FL Surgeon General Finds 84% Increase in Cardiac-Related DEATH in Males 18-39 Following mRNA Vaccine – Recommends Young Males Refrain from Receiving COVID Vaccine
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4099342/posts
You're welcome!
Regards,
I’ll give you that the headline from this report is technically responsive to my request. They were able to perform a statistical analysis showing an elevated risk for a narrow slice of the population. But they also say:
”In this statewide study of vaccinated Florida residents aged 18 years or older, COVID-vaccination was not associated with an elevated risk for all-cause mortality.”
Pretty direct.
I also think we should keep our powder dry until we know a little more about the study - like who conducted it and what the peer reviewers think.
This analysis makes me think we should wait a bit before we draw any conclusions:
Right: So if we don't focus only on men aged 18 to 39, but rather widen the scope to include literally everyone (e.g., moribund 85-year-old women, etc.), then no elevated mortality is observable.
Only for 18-to-39-year-olds was elevated mortality observable.
Hence: Pretty frickin' obvious that the Vaxx has an overall detrimental health effect - at least on certain identifiable segments of the population!
Good enough for me!
Like determining that taking, say, chemotherapy has a net detrimental effect on healthy, young people - but not on the population as a whole, if you widen the scope of the study to include cancer patients.
Regards,
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.