Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/05/2022 12:08:51 PM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: Red Badger

You mean the climate experts really don’t know? I’m shocked!!!!!!!


2 posted on 10/05/2022 12:10:05 PM PDT by rdl6989 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Looking at climate records that date “all the way back to 1979” is a laughable sentence.


3 posted on 10/05/2022 12:10:09 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

read my mind!

of course their models are missing something!

the models were DESIGNED to show warming when CO2 goes up!


4 posted on 10/05/2022 12:10:17 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

“her wrath is being felt in southern Africa and South America “

Weather sure goes out of its way to make sure minorities are hardest hit, just like tornadoes make a bee line straight to the nearest trailer park


5 posted on 10/05/2022 12:10:55 PM PDT by dsrtsage ( Complexity is just simple lacking imagination)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
"La Niña's Shock Return Suggests Important Details Are Missing in Climate Models"

Like...facts?

6 posted on 10/05/2022 12:12:52 PM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
While climate models accurately paint the big picture on future trends,

Asserted without evidence. How's that 1970s Ice Age coming along?

7 posted on 10/05/2022 12:14:57 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (The government sees you as either livestock or pet. If things get bad they will eat their pets too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
...researchers found a discrepancy between real-world observations and 16 current climate models.

There's only one thing to do: climate scientists with advanced degrees in journalism, sociology, and gender studies are going to have to massage the data.

8 posted on 10/05/2022 12:17:28 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
"Looking back at El Niños and La Niñas since 1979, researchers found a discrepancy between real-world observations and 16 current climate models."

This proves the climate models are broken and don't work. Yet we are destroying the energy industry and the world economy based on bad science.

We are basing national policy on supersition, not science.

10 posted on 10/05/2022 12:21:27 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie (LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

“These models were unable to reproduce reality in both equatorial and midlatitude oceans. Only one even got remotely close.”

So long as you’re twisting data to fit theories instead of the right way round, you might want to expect this.


11 posted on 10/05/2022 12:21:49 PM PDT by decal (They won't stop, so they'll have to be stopped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Plus, this nonscientist little girl who “just loves health, nature and the environment” made a hash of the la niña phenomenon. She clearly has no idea what she was trying to write about. The hazards of having ignorant self appointed freelance “science writers” is manifest.


14 posted on 10/05/2022 12:26:39 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard ( Resist the narrative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger; All
"Perhaps there is an overlooked natural variable in the southern ocean that spans multiple decades.
Or perhaps it's climate change."

Annnnnd .. there it is.

Wish I could Meme-I'd have The Church Lady from the old Saturday Night Live, saying "Perhaps it's CLIMATE CHANGE (in place of satan) as the explanation for anything and everything.

Anyway, if everyone will just submit to being slaves to the globalist billionaires, the weather will change and be more helpful. 🙄

15 posted on 10/05/2022 12:36:30 PM PDT by Pajamajan ( PRAY FOR OUR NATION. Never be a peaceful slave in new Socialist America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

“Unless climate scientists can figure out why...”

Climate change could continue to favor her for years to come.”


If “climate scientists” (lol) can’t figure out the “why”, then what makes you think climate change “could” do whatever you’re saying it could do?


16 posted on 10/05/2022 12:37:11 PM PDT by Magic Fingers (Political correctness mutates in order to remain virulent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

The climate models are crap. They’re useful only to create panic among the sheeple.


18 posted on 10/05/2022 12:42:40 PM PDT by beethovenfan (The REAL Great Reset will be when Jesus returns. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Don’t Call It A ‘Comeback’!


20 posted on 10/05/2022 12:44:01 PM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
It sucks when your models don't reflect reality. The only bright spot is the people with the inadequate models are recognizing the discrepancy and asking why. Clearly the models are missing inputs and/or misinterpreting inputs/effects. As long as the models fail to match reality, they are just hypotheticals unsuited for driving public policy.
22 posted on 10/05/2022 12:50:24 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Yeah, ‘details missing’; like the Arctic will be ice free, children in Britain won’t know what snow is, pacific islands will be underwater (or else tip over), just a few minor details like that.


24 posted on 10/05/2022 1:08:15 PM PDT by Roadrunner383 (;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger; All
"The climate models are still getting reasonable answers for the average warming," says atmospheric scientist Robert Wills from the University of Washington,

Nonsense.

The answers are pre-determined by those building the models.

If the "answers" are not "reasonable", the people building the models tweak the models.

That is how it is done. There are many variables which have unknown values. Those values are tweaked to make the model look "reasonable".

25 posted on 10/05/2022 1:08:33 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
"With global warming generally increasing sea surface temperatures..."

No need to read further...

26 posted on 10/05/2022 1:20:50 PM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

“La Niña’s Shock Return Suggests Important Details Are Missing in Climate Models”

not possible: climate “science” is “settled” ...


27 posted on 10/05/2022 1:21:26 PM PDT by catnipman (In a post-covid world, ALL "science" is now political science: stolen elections have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

The La Niña,El Niño phenomenon was knwn by the indigenous of the west coast of the Americas hundreds of years ago and watched closely.

My mother born 1913 in Arizona, learned of it and did her own almost infallible predictions of the weather based on it.we children all respect those who live by their own watchful eyes according to it position in the Pacific.


28 posted on 10/05/2022 1:41:13 PM PDT by amihow (It is Western Civilization that confers privilege, not whiteness. Ask Carson, MLK, Sowell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson