Posted on 10/01/2022 6:03:04 PM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal
I think she’s spot on. I just went back and read some of that one’s post. He rode the lightning over a year ago and yet, it feels like just yesterday. 😄😂
It’s not a vaccine. A vaccine prevents infection. This does not prevent infection.
It is more like a therapeutic. All it does is prevent serious illness or death if infected. The fact that the illness is relatively mild proves that fact.
Obviously every such concoction creates serious side effects in a small percent of the population which is why drug makers of vaccines get lawsuit immunity. Without it no one would make vaccines.
Without credible studies we don’t yet know what the real long term effects of this mRNA inoculation truly are.
Deaths from vaccines are not unknown with all the vaccines.
...It is more like a therapeutic. All it does is prevent serious illness or death if infected. The fact that the illness is relatively mild proves that fact.
...
Only wrong, retread/n00b....
So in June, approximately 85% of the population of Canada had had at least two shots, but 92% of all COVID deaths were in the fully vaccinated — 92%. So this is a pandemic of the vaccinated.
And what was more alarming was that the people that had had one or two boosters, in other words, three or four shots, made up 81% of all the COVID deaths in the month of June, even though those people were only 34% of the population.
So this is the clearest evidence that the more shots you have, the more likely you will die of COVID....
Just ONE of NUMEROUS “CREDIBLE” studies, 2@.
The fact that the virus is relatively mild only proves that it is following the exact path other illnesses follow as a disease spreads through a population.
It’s less severe because that is how viruses evolve and as people gain natural immunity.
Did you even read the article? He’s a top cardiologist. Evidence-based medicine is a method and an approach, not a medical specialty.
And YES the doctors investigating the vaccines’ safety did not take the evidence into account, in fact they tried to hide it. Pfizer tried its best to have its test results hidden aka censored FOR 75 years. Does that sound like they had good safety data? Freedom of information court orders brought some of the papers out in the open and they are horrific.
People died left right and centre from multiple causes. At the end of the day, all-cause mortality was no better in unvaccinated vs vaccinated. The unvaccinated died at the same rate as the vaccinated regardless of what media propaganda says. READ THE ARTICLE.
Millions upon millions will be negatively affected, if the Pfizer data is anything to go on. It’s NOT a small percentage. The overall numbers are vast. Stop quoting propaganda and read what the doc is saying BASED ON PFizer’s own data.
In any case it doesn’t matter if it’s a small percentage: ANYONE being killed by a vaccine invalidates its safety and completely throws out the case for mandates. I don’t care how effective a vaccine supposedly is - and the data suggest otherwise- you can’t go around killing people by forcing them to take your shot. a you should be sued, jailed, stoped by any means necessary. You don’t get to kill one group to save another.
Correct
You probably are focused only on this Covid infection.
All childhood vaccines have some degree of danger to a very few. But because the benefit of wiping out polio, whooping cough, rubella, chickenpox, small pox, rabies, etc far outweighs the very small percentage of people (actually far less than a one percent) that have a negative reaction society takes the view that vaccines are beneficial. And vaccine makers can’t be held legally responsible (any legislation)for that very tiny slice of the population that has serious side effects. It’s the trade off society makes.
Now this Covid vaccine actually isn’t a vaccine at all because it does not prevent infection. It does apparently minimize side effects that caused unvaccinated people to end up on ventilators, which is the kiss of death usually.
We won’t really know what the actual long term side effects are until legitimate impartial studies are done. Not studies by partisans or people whose relatives died, or attention seekers, etc.
I have no idea wher the actual truth lies in the debate but I am suspicious of the methods used by one side. Call me skeptical.
Please explain why you are shilling for the poison vax.
I didn’t even notice that 2aprotectstherest was gone :P (gone just over a year now)
You may have it right that this is him.. 2aprotectstherest’s postings are very similar.
Actually I’m not shilling for anything nor anyone. Unlike many, I have no dog in this fight.
I do believe that reason should be utilized.
Reason affirms that flooding the bodies of hundreds of millions of people with deadly spike proteins is destructive.
If that is, indeed, true, does that make it okay to go ahead and chance it with the Covid “vaccine”? That is like saying one can die either by a gunshot from a .22 or a .38. In either case, you die.
Bad analogy/association.
Actually, the one thing about life is that no one gets out alive.
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/10/10/1651
A Case Report: Multifocal Necrotizing Encephalitis and Myocarditis after BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination against COVID-19
by Michael Mörz
Institute of Pathology ’Georg Schmorl’, The Municipal Hospital Dresden-Friedrichstadt, Friedrichstrasse 41, 01067 Dresden, Germany
Academic Editor: Sung Ryul Shim
Vaccines 2022, 10(10), 1651; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10101651 (registering DOI)
Received: 31 August 2022 / Revised: 25 September 2022 / Accepted: 27 September 2022 / Published: 1 October 2022
Just shut up and go get your shot.
We need fewer people like you around here.
Sounds a lot like David Chase,too.
Some of these guys have multiple personalities.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.