Posted on 09/24/2022 1:22:49 AM PDT by Golden Eagle
A former vice president for the EcoHealth Alliance, a major funder of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, claims that his organization "developed" SARS-CoV-2 through gain-of-function research that makes viruses more dangerous.
"The process of developing SARS-CoV-2 was also described in detail in the proposal submitted to, and ultimately funded by, the National Institutes of Health (HHS NIH), The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), by EcoHealth Alliance with the WIV and [University of North Carolina] listed as collaborators," according to the sworn declaration of Andrew Huff, who is represented by the attorney Thomas Renz.
The statement is included in a much larger packet dated Sept. 12 posted by Renz, who represents clients challenging Covid-19 mandates, apparently directed to Wisconsin GOP Sen. Ron Johnson, whose name is in the file name.
"Anthony Fauci funded the creation of SARS-COV2 and lied to Congress about funding Gain-of-Function work," Renz wrote in the summary – a claim also recently made by former CDC Director Robert Redfield.
(Excerpt) Read more at justthenews.com ...
T.B. Yoits wrote: “https://nypost.com/2021/10/21/faucis-agency-admits-it-funded-gain-of-function-work-in-wuhan-what-else-are-they-keeping-from-us/“
I’m not in favor of gain of function research or Fauci, but you have yet to meet any standard of proof. When are you going to prove the federal government covered up the development of a bioweapon in order to steal an election?
You have three elements to prove:
1. COVID was developed as a bioweapon.
2. The federal government, not just Fauci and EcoHealth Alliance, but the majority of the federal government conducted a coverup.
3. The purpose of this coverup was to steal and election.
Some of these incentives were worth millions of dollars for large school districts and universities. They wen't going to complain, but only comply to get the money...
Proof? Let's start with the payoffs from government to Propaganda Media to censor information. Those slipped out only after lawsuits. Let's look at how the government employees like Fauxi insisted that it wasn't from a lab despite knowing that it was.
T.B. Yoits wrote: “Proof? Let’s start with the payoffs from government to Propaganda Media to censor information. Those slipped out only after lawsuits. Let’s look at how the government employees like Fauxi insisted that it wasn’t from a lab despite knowing that it was.”
And, you still haven’t met any standard of proof, all you have is pure conspiracy laden speculation.
I can't help you if you won't look at the links.
T.B. Yoits wrote: “I can’t help you if you won’t look at the links.”
I looked at the link and it refutes your claims.
Debunked by who? CDC•gov? WHO•org? NIH•gov? Politifact? CNN? MSNBC? NY Times? LA Times? Snopes? Politifact? FactCheck•org? ProPublica? OpenSecrets? Ahhhhh Reuter!
Oh they got picture of supposedly SARS-CoV-2 virus that cause Covid-19 infection?
Have you even seen this image in the electron microscope? Neither me. Because if I would peep in the electron microscope of any thing whether bacteria or human dead cell debris, it can only see it as black it white, do you know that?
Even these supposedly electron microscope images are fake because none have any available scientific paper available.
Oh well, as I said before, you static mind is already made up, nothing can be change, answering you just stupid waste of time, either you're paid Covid-19 apologist here at FR or useful idiot.
wannabegeek wrote: “Oh well, as I said before, you static mind is already made up, nothing can be change, answering you just stupid waste of time, either you’re paid Covid-19 apologist here at FR or useful idiot.”
A ‘useful idiot’ is one who insists that viruses do not cause disease (like yourself).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.