Posted on 09/22/2022 7:51:17 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
The Biden administration issued an executive order calling for biotechnology that can “predictably program biology in the same way in which we write software and program computers,” a transhumanist practice, in service of human “health.”
As an example of such biotechnology, Executive Order 14081 included by implication the COVID-19 mRNA injections, citing the COVID-19 “pandemic” as demonstrating “the vital role of biotechnology … in developing and producing life-saving … vaccines that protect Americans and the world.”
The mRNA jabs are an example of what has been described as “the most prominent area of biotechnology”: The “production” of ostensibly “therapeutic proteins and other drugs through genetic engineering.” However, while the proteins produced by the mRNA shot were touted as beneficial, evidence has emerged that they are toxic to humans. In fact, as StatNews noted in 2016, mRNA experiments were abandoned by several pharma groups before the COVID-19 outbreak over “concerns about toxicity.”
In support of its proposal to use biotechnology to “aid” human health, the order called upon the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to “submit a report assessing how to use biotechnology … to achieve medical breakthroughs, reduce the overall burden of disease, and improve health outcomes...”
(Excerpt) Read more at lifesitenews.com ...
Lysenkoism
Klaus Schwab will be so happy to hear this.
$15,000 needed .. Receipts & Pledges to-date: $65,085
81%
WOO HOO!! We’re now over 81%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.
7 DAYS LEFT........
https://freerepublic.com/donate/
Biden is a dead soul puppet who does not actually believe God, so now he is echoingh Herari, the homo puppet of Klaus Schwab.
Blue screen of death.
Only with no possibility of a reboot.
I could imagine that kind of treatment used for true genetic diseases (e.g. cystic-fibrosis). In the same way I can be very okay with breast enhancement surgery for those women who had a mastectomy. The idea is to set things right, not to “improve” things.
Decent surgical knowledge took a millenium or two to develop, accelerating in the past two centuries.
Equivalent genetic knowledge is in its infancy. Sometimes miraculous results can be had, even today, tinkering around the edges. But major messing with the germline, aside from selective breeding, which has its own ethical issues, is going to produce many failures.
‘Someone’ has the goal of changing humanity from ‘made in God’s image’ to made in ‘someone else’s image’.
Dims first.
Because Windows works so well and is completely invulnerable to attack. Okay then.
And the failures probably won’t be known until after years or decades of use of a presumed safe technology.
It’s the new tattoo.
I spent a lot of time in grad school trying to develop self-programing programs as part of the CASE project for the Department of Defense.
Lots of stuff went wrong basically every time, so much so Lawrence Lasker has allegedly said that our difficulties indirectly inspired the movie “War Games”.
In comparison, it was pretty simple stuff.
I can only imagine the screw ups that will happen when biological entities can self-program.
Mary Shelley had a bit to say about that.
Her monster was fabricate from a derad man. And she was such a good writer.
“predictably program biology in the same way in which we write software and program computers,”
The problem with this idea is that we designed the computers, and we created programming languages that software is made with. So we understand those things, in a way that we are never likely to understand biology, which was made by a far superior intelligence to our own.
Might as well ask a cat to program your computer and see how that goes.
Poignant analogy
Let’s call it the “Brave New World Initiative.”
Brave New World, here we come!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.