Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Once Again Walks Back Biden Remarks on Taiwan
American Greatness ^ | 19 Sep, 2022 | ERIC LENDRUM

Posted on 09/20/2022 5:04:00 AM PDT by MtnClimber

On Sunday, Joe Biden asserted during an interview that American troops would be prepared to defend the island nation of Taiwan from a Chinese invasion, leading to White House officials again walking back his comments shortly thereafter.

As reported by the New York Post, Biden was asked during a “60 Minutes” interview by CBS’ Scott Pelley if the United States would take action to “defend the island” in the event that China decided to invade. A possible Chinese invasion of Taiwan has already been frequently compared to the ongoing invasion of Ukraine by Russia, with the Biden Administration’s response to that conflict being widely criticized.

“[W]ould U.S. forces defend the island?” Pelley asked. In response, Biden said “yes, if in fact there was an unprecedented attack.”

“So unlike Ukraine, to be clear, sir — U.S. forces, U.S. men and women, would defend Taiwan in the event of a Chinese invasion?” Pelley asked further, to which Biden simply responded “yes.”

But shortly after the interview, a White House official told “60 Minutes” that the U.S. has not changed its approach to Taiwan, and that it would maintain a policy that the administration has called “strategic ambiguity.” The policy calls for refusing to make a clear statement on whether or not military action would be taken in the event of a conflict breaking out, while still supplying Taiwan with military equipment to help them better prepare.

In early September, the State Department announced that it had sold $1.1 billion worth of weapons and military equipment to Taiwan, including anti-ship and air-to-air missiles.

“This package was in the works for some time precisely because we expected it would be needed as China increased its pressure on Taiwan,” said State Department spokesman Vedant Patel after the sale was announced on September 6th. In response, Liu Pengyu, spokesman for the Chinese Embassy, warned that the deal “severely jeopardizes China-US relations and peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait.”


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Military/Veterans; Society
KEYWORDS: china
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: TermLimits4All

Indeed, we give them away...


21 posted on 09/20/2022 6:10:49 AM PDT by OKSooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
it would maintain a policy that the administration has called “strategic ambiguity.”

What we need is Trump's policy, meaning he doesn't have to say a word and they know they had better not do anything stupid.

22 posted on 09/20/2022 6:12:53 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Flatlinejoe is having increasing trouble spewing out the policies of his traitorous puppetmasters. Comprehension by Braindeadbiden has long since bottomed out.


23 posted on 09/20/2022 6:22:38 AM PDT by Carl Vehse (A proud member of the LGBFJB community)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Obama/Biden say something and then the White House walks back but Obama had a Clarification Team that followed him around ,LOL


24 posted on 09/20/2022 6:26:43 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

I guess, at this point, it doesn’t matter what he says. The follow-up from a staffer is more important.


25 posted on 09/20/2022 6:37:39 AM PDT by Theophilous Meatyard III
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

why doesnt President White House give the speeches and interviews and cut out the puppet president


26 posted on 09/20/2022 6:43:26 AM PDT by joshua c (to disrupt the system, we must disrupt our lives, cut the cable tv)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

***The policy calls for refusing to make a clear statement on whether or not military action would be taken in the event of a conflict breaking out,***

This is what got us into the Korean War in 1950.


27 posted on 09/20/2022 7:04:47 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar ( FR is on GAB! https://gab.com/groups/67851)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Taiwan needs to sign on with globohomo. That’s the way to get protection from China.


28 posted on 09/20/2022 7:13:57 AM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Biden is just a flunky front man Obama and Susan Rice feet seen behind curtain.


29 posted on 09/20/2022 7:51:17 AM PDT by Vaduz ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson