Michigan | 280,605
Montana | 1,896
Minnesota | 48,328
Nevada | 14,738 Precinct level data
New Jersey | 56,563
New Mexico | 3,844
North Carolina | 21,04
Ohio | 55,330 Precinct level data
Pennsylvania | 91,086 Precinct level data
Virginia | 63,607
In the 2012 elections, for Colorado there were 10 counties where the vote totals exceeded the number of registered voters. My county had 104% voter turnout which was the lowest of the 10. One county had 140% turnout!
Voter ID
In person voting only.....you can't show up, you don't vote....period. (Absentee voting available for Military Personnel only)
Unfortunately this reads like an incomplete draft not what I would expect from something called American Thinker. What does the SoS number even mean? Are they saying Cobb reported 8.8% error and the State reports 0.68% for Cobb instead?
Without clearly explaining the numbers thrown around in the piece, it’s not just worthless but undermines the point they are trying to make about data retention. Calling for digital records for voting is a terrible idea. Just as anyone competent in programming will tell you online voting is a terrible idea. Digitized versions of paper records is fine.
Keep in mind. Any un-auditable process is on it’s face fraudulent. If they are using the SURE system to compare actual counted ballots, yes there are more ballots counted in PA delco (25,000 ) and Montco (25,000) because the county election commissions do not update the SURE system. The reason they don’t accurately update the SURE system is to hide the fraud. Any un-auditable process is on it’s face fraudulent.
When I vote here in Florida, I tell them my name and address and hand them my passport.
They check if I’m in their electronic system, and if I voted already, and if not, they print an appropriate ballot.
The number of ballots cast should never exceed the number of people who requested and got a ballot.
It is possible for them to print out a replacement ballot if I mess up my ballot, but the ballot being replaced should be physically voided.
Replacement ballots can also be made during the counting process if a ballot can’t be scanned, but the original should be voided.
The numbers of replacement ballots by issue point and time should be investigated.
One felony count of destruction of records per vote record not kept.
Ballots should be of special paper stock so election thieves can’t just go to Office Depot and crank out phonies on home laser printers.
Ballot printers might be given specific pixelation fault patterns.
This would allow ballots to be tied to specific printers and make ballots printed on say home laser printers detectable.
Cobb County, GA: 8.8% (Secretary of State data 0.68%)
We know what fat pig caused this. Stolen Elections have serious consequences.
Well that's interesting because I got this reply from My County's (Iredel) BOE...
RE: County Records Request of August 30, 2022, Reference # R000217-083022
Dear Xxxxx Xxxxxxx,
Iredell County, NC received a public records request from you on August 30, 2022. Your request mentioned:
CVR (Cast Vote Record) for the 11/03/2020 Election
Iredell County, NC has reviewed its files and has determined there are no responsive record(s) to your request. Cast vote records are not accessible to the general public and there is no pending investigation concerning the 2020 general election.
For questions or additional information, please reply to this email. }
Sincerely,
Iredell County
To monitor the progress or update this request please log into the Public Records Request Center
Is that number supposed to be 2,104 or 21,004 or 21,040 or 21,400 ???
Traditionally voters mark their ballots using ink pens.
It is my understanding that one company makes a system wherein voters make their selections electronically and then a ballot is neatly printed.
Such systems avoid the unreadable ballot problem, but such systems make election fraud easier to accomplish since ballots have no direct human imprint. No election thief has to hand mark say 5,000 fraudulent ballots, leaving hand prints on each one.
I should add that mail-in ballots using any system probably have multiple traces of human hand oils, or should. Think fingerprints. Mail-in ballots should also have been folded.
Hand oil marks might be detectable by UV light or chemical or heat treatment. Ballots from 2020 might be tested before they are destroyed.
Election thieves might have been careful not to leave hand oils on ballots, but then these ballots would stand out.
The 22 months is over with, unfortunately.
How good of a job are election officials doing in retaining these records?
They have no intention of retaining these records. They know they aren’t going to go to prison for destroying the information. Oops, my bad.
Kemp, Raffensberger, and Carr let Dekalb County destroy their ballots within a month or two, if I’m not mistaken. All the ballots, from Fulton Cty, that were supposed to be audited ended up in a shredder.
Nothing happens.
That’s why they need to destroy these records.