Unfortunately this reads like an incomplete draft not what I would expect from something called American Thinker. What does the SoS number even mean? Are they saying Cobb reported 8.8% error and the State reports 0.68% for Cobb instead?
Without clearly explaining the numbers thrown around in the piece, it’s not just worthless but undermines the point they are trying to make about data retention. Calling for digital records for voting is a terrible idea. Just as anyone competent in programming will tell you online voting is a terrible idea. Digitized versions of paper records is fine.
digital records for voting is a terrible idea.>>> In PA The registered voter system is a digital system. Called the SURE system. It is by law supposed to be the baseline and updated accurately with who voted in each cycle. It is not. Here is the link to the PA Auditor Generals report. Then SOS Kathy Bookvar advised the Election commissioners to not cooperate with the required audit.
https://www.paauditor.gov/Media/Default/Reports/Department%20of%20State_SURE%20Audit%20Report%2012-19-19.pdf