That is a very low Vitamin D level for those with the association.
To: Mazey; ckilmer; goodnesswins; Jane Long; BusterDog; jy8z; ProtectOurFreedom; matthew fuller; ...
The “Take Charge Of Your Health” Ping List
This high volume ping list is for health articles and studies which describe something you or your doctor, when informed, may be able to immediately implement for your benefit.
Email me to get on either the “Common/Top Issues” (20% fewer pings) or “Everything” list.
2 posted on
09/07/2022 2:26:48 PM PDT by
ConservativeMind
(Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
To: ConservativeMind
What a dilemma. Sunshine on the skin is the best supplier of vitamin D, but melanoma patients are supposed to avoid sun exposure?
4 posted on
09/07/2022 2:33:16 PM PDT by
fwdude
(Racism is not dead, but it is on life support - kept alive by politicians….” — Thomas Sowell)
To: ConservativeMind
That’s been known for decades.
How does this need a new study????
5 posted on
09/07/2022 2:51:37 PM PDT by
metmom
(...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith…)
To: ConservativeMind
Vitamin D should be between 60 ng/ml and 100 ng/ml for optimal protection from SARS-CoV-2. Those with levels under 40 ng/ml have significantly higher incidence of death from a SARS-CoV-2 infection.
8 posted on
09/07/2022 3:53:07 PM PDT by
Myrddin
To: ConservativeMind
Just took a class where the instructor recommended 10,000 IU daily for 3 months, then monitor, goal being 50ng in the blood.
Question: what form of K is best to take in concert with D3? Thanks in advance.
To: ConservativeMind
I wonder if milk is a sufficient source for Vitamin D?
14 posted on
09/09/2022 7:16:10 AM PDT by
pnz1
("These people have gone stone-cold crazy")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson